From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17052: substitute-command-keys strips text properties, bug#8911: huh? Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 19:00:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <73ce5055-2cc4-4908-acf7-cee037012864@default> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8889"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Juanma Barranquero , Lars Ingebrigtsen , 17052@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas , Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 17 04:03:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kerGw-0002BX-4S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 04:03:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38634 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kerGu-0003Rm-LN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:03:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33650) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kerGo-0003Rb-GC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:03:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46393) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kerGo-00054V-5W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:03:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kerGo-0008OW-2v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:03:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 03:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17052 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 17052-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17052.160558214132216 (code B ref 17052); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 03:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17052) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Nov 2020 03:02:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57939 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kerG9-0008NY-It for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:02:21 -0500 Original-Received: from aserp2130.oracle.com ([141.146.126.79]:51314) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kerG6-0008NJ-Vh for 17052@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:02:20 -0500 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0AH2sDSB023211; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 03:02:12 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=A4jW/SlazBrBfKSxmf5w+4d2w5RbIL1FVlcq9/NcO4I=; b=aF9Zhj3ncs3KlGKwvJHwTlpls/PZW3Tits434uJpTQsrCIL2Jut+WaV4wNsHE87R1jY+ S35wbJjKkZ8KFE5d3d+w/1CbEmeRtByVuw0XV7XssOUJBkCCZM5ZCTtwh0M2I84CRTp/ inUso4+2No1SUtG+fbzo7HbmRmYjXr2uUY3Qyffykm1EIddQuQs8y6CFyN4zNTElAWmV H7mBa73Wc8YnbOiIj0qntpR+er9aKuqTu4UXDreUYk6DlDSrTLLFMsBhgB/vanyR56kG 03ZEbeVmxD6bWL7eU3rUQcOguId4iccUbMDnW6Dz828halwlkbsEUL6xxDh9nuS2uLXd jw== Original-Received: from userp3020.oracle.com (userp3020.oracle.com [156.151.31.79]) by aserp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 34t4rarej6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 03:02:12 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0AH2tRGj012775; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 03:00:11 GMT Original-Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by userp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 34ts0q9k17-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 03:00:11 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0002.oracle.com (abhmp0002.oracle.com [141.146.116.8]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 0AH30AxN030494; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 03:00:10 GMT In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.5071.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9807 signatures=668682 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2011170023 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9807 signatures=668682 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2011170023 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:193512 Archived-At: > > I don't understand the relation between this bug, #17052, > > and bug #8911. Half of the messages in the 8911 thread > > are about 17052, and the subjects seem quite different. > > > > But it looks like 8911 is still open (wishlist). Is that correct? > ^^^^ you probably mean 8951 Yes, sorry; I meant 8951. > > Why/how did these two bugs get overlapped or combined? >=20 > It was my perhaps ill-advised attempt to combine the discussions about > the Lisp conversion of `substitute-command-keys'. >=20 > (FWIW, I intend to look into Bug#8951 soon-ish.)