On 2/21/2022 10:31 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen >> Cc: Jim Porter , 54062@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 18:39:16 +0100 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >>> Thanks; I have no further comments. >> >> So I've pushed the patch series to Emacs 29. > > Something's amiss here: the new test fails on MS-Windows because it > signals an error inside eshell-wait-for-subprocess: > > Test esh-proc-test/sigpipe-exits-process backtrace: > signal(eshell-pipe-broken #) > eshell-output-object-to-target("killed\n" #) > eshell-output-object("killed\n" nil [nil (nil . 0) (nil . 0)]) > #f(compiled-function () #)() > apply(#f(compiled-function () #) nil) > timer-event-handler([t 25107 54636 874750 nil #f(compiled-function ( > sleep-for(0.1) > sit-for(0.1) > (while (if all eshell-process-list (eshell-interactive-process-p)) ( > (let ((start (current-time))) (while (if all eshell-process-list (es > eshell-wait-for-subprocess(t) > > Sounds like the shell is already dead/killed when > eshell-wait-for-subprocess tries to send it a string? Thanks for merging, and sorry about the bustage. This turned out to be because `eshell-sentinel' for the "head" process in the pipeline called `eshell-output-object', but because the tail process was already dead, it raised `eshell-pipe-broken'. I believe the reason this only manifested on MS Windows was due to a timing difference between `delete-process' and `signal-process'; using the `delete-process' path on GNU/Linux shows the same problem. Attached is a patch that ignores the `eshell-pipe-broken' error in `eshell-sentinel'. It's not really an error in that case anyway, since we only want to write the last bit of output *if we can*. -------------------- There's just one problem remaining: when running the following command on MS Windows[1], you'll (usually) see two Eshell prompts get emitted after it finishes: yes | sh -c 'read NAME' However, this is a separate bug that appears in Emacs 27.2 as well. It can happen whenever multiple commands in a pipeline get killed. For example: ~ $ sh -c 'while true; do sleep 1; echo y; done' | sh -c 'while true; do read NAME; echo ${NAME}; done' C-c C-c ; Call `eshell-interrupt-process' The same happens with C-c C-k (`eshell-kill-process') too. I'll file another bug about this, but I wanted to mention it here so no one's surprised if they see this come up when testing out this patch. [1] Well, I assume it's a problem on MS Windows. I actually tested the MS Windows code path on GNU/Linux.