> I'm still not able to reproduce the problem, but a different user > reported exactly the same problem... which then went away. So > something's definitely going on here. Ok so on a whim I went and started bisecting my init file, and lo and behold it turns out there is some sort of subtle interaction with doom mode-line. Specifically, I configure it via: (use-package-select doom-modeline :after all-the-icons :hook (after-init . doom-modeline-mode) :config (column-number-mode 1) :custom (doom-modeline-icon t) (doom-modeline-project-detection ‘project) <——— commenting out this line fixes the problem (doom-modeline-major-mode-icon t) (doom-modeline-major-mode-color-icon t) (doom-modeline-buffer-state-icon t) (doom-modeline-buffer-modification-icon t) (doom-modeline-unicode-fallback nil) (doom-modeline-modal-icon t) (doom-modeline-minor-modes nil) (doom-modeline-indent-info nil) (doom-modeline-lsp t)) So somehow this new eql change is related to the project root detection? I tried byte-compiling doom modeling again to see if perhaps there is an additional warning triggered, but the only warning emitted was In doom-modeline--project-root: doom-modeline-core.el:1193:26: Warning: ‘project-roots’ is an obsolete function (as of 0.3.0); use ‘project-root’ instead. From this function: (defun doom-modeline--project-root () "Get the path to the root of your project. Return nil if no project was found." (or doom-modeline--project-root (setq doom-modeline--project-root (pcase doom-modeline-project-detection ('ffip (when (fboundp 'ffip-get-project-root-directory) (let ((inhibit-message t)) (ffip-get-project-root-directory)))) ('projectile (when (fboundp 'projectile-project-root) (projectile-project-root))) ('project (when (fboundp 'project-current) (when-let ((project (project-current))) (car (project-roots project))))))))) <——————— here Best regards, Jacob Faibussowitsch (Jacob Fai - booss - oh - vitch) > On Aug 6, 2021, at 05:45, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > > Jacob Faibussowitsch writes: > >> Is this with a fresh >> checkout (or "make bootstrap")? >> >> I’m not sure I follow, what is the difference? > > Sorry, that was unclear. I meant that as an inclusive or, and as > opposed to doing an incremental build. > >> I am able to reproduce/build emacs via: >> >> 1. git checkout master >> 2. make clean >> 3. ./reconfigure.sh (attached) >> 3. make all > > I'm still not able to reproduce the problem, but a different user > reported exactly the same problem... which then went away. So > something's definitely going on here. > > So I've added Stefan to the CCs -- could you take a look at this? It > looks like a possible problem with the recent eql changes, but is > weirdly difficult to reproduce. > > diff --git a/lisp/frame.el b/lisp/frame.el > index 9b3d120598..8c05ad2fe5 100644 > --- a/lisp/frame.el > +++ b/lisp/frame.el > @@ -36,7 +36,11 @@ as its argument.") > (cl-generic-define-context-rewriter window-system (value) > ;; If `value' is a `consp', it's probably an old-style specializer, > ;; so just use it, and anyway `eql' isn't very useful on cons cells. > - `(window-system ,(if (consp value) value `(eql ,value)))) > + `(window-system ,(if (consp value) value > + ;; WARNING: unsure whether this eql expression > + ;; is actually an eql specializer. > + ;; Bug #47327 > + `(eql ',value)))) > > > -- > (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) > bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no