From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#63288: 30.0.50; Emacs 30 packages fail to build with native comp on some machines Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 12:33:16 +0200 Message-ID: <7056CD7F-CB7B-4325-9DCC-888B609AFCBA@gmail.com> References: <87mt2jl97p.fsf@posteo.net> <83mt2jjqzg.fsf@gnu.org> <098D461C-A742-45C4-BD85-B2F9B93F1D07@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.15\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18452"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Brian Leung , Eli Zaretskii , Andrea Corallo To: 63288@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu May 11 12:34:22 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1px3cs-0004ck-AJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 May 2023 12:34:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1px3cd-0001jk-Uz; Thu, 11 May 2023 06:34:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1px3ca-0001jO-H1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2023 06:34:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1px3cY-0006rb-D6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2023 06:34:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1px3cX-0006Yp-RL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2023 06:34:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 10:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63288 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 63288-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B63288.168380120625175 (code B ref 63288); Thu, 11 May 2023 10:34:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 63288) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2023 10:33:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49792 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1px3bx-0006Xz-UG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2023 06:33:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-f47.google.com ([209.85.167.47]:62704) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1px3bv-0006Xl-K8 for 63288@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2023 06:33:24 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-f47.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-4f139de8cefso45257235e87.0 for <63288@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 11 May 2023 03:33:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1683801197; x=1686393197; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:sender:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cbHfkyRSyDxILh4ohWh1PBS6a7DSkTVHecNcg5BRLkY=; b=Gd8wfNk0Yvu5JdThidsfO6UzgE/ilkZVCH9oP/0YcrMnWXbyy+dwPN4rZjLwuAeire 0ltPp9JySqHPYJcB7gJ4+moPegOw87wzL92qJVyM4skE6qAutwOvzVGlhAXvC4OyLF7F pxIhkE84dX8pctwmofKi9zyKrEguIvCmEcgj92PomfJYeRXeXUyMX3pWV3cCkEbQtx0w l27+kSNFDMxLCWlRuiDw3os7wMRGhzbp5xQF+o2t3Ys/54jguIZbiG3LGbVWAy36wMb8 s3P21BSq9wwjHobTHSfl3H6f14qjGleILb+9GwyUXEuDmR6BfjMJI5le/G4zA0zhaoG0 mnAg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683801197; x=1686393197; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:sender:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cbHfkyRSyDxILh4ohWh1PBS6a7DSkTVHecNcg5BRLkY=; b=Jbe0glU27ziyQSbob74psuhna7DNmBu5/ElRFNh+NtTYK6LZ0jQJML+vjkPHJstQuu HuryEcuo9uhy4VrAcAbwZo/kpVts4PWnhuVvBxS5BD9qpSr3Nqwl0PQclRiYigRzDAcC U65xY10FCGrQXI/uXwcqOFvS+szOXyZv8OoV5fD0Z0sup0xsXy2cNizZI/rUm15suCy1 b3iURFnSdgGvYtauEIZfarKAszh2MR3UA8V6Qt82f3BwnTHoUYN+PS1Di3orf3bL+Xlj G4NcwtH6DKhcv5aZxFOWUOVoZcZLtEQef9yHFrNEejXNc81DPmJGBz4Tcpf8xOOEZydA r2GA== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwMhlJcNCENxSptyRvAsUDl11qknBVczeP9MI/6Y+4oZVqYR1gw YTw8naObFuUVq9jwwYfHevOHEJLfVpU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4CTMVjzBgF7GuOB7mtsLRrSnIILR5joJ2lV8/AR38HsD58EY9UPKIMEXU2wpONGBx6D+U0rA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3b21:b0:4f2:6754:ff15 with SMTP id f33-20020a0565123b2100b004f26754ff15mr742056lfv.27.1683801197420; Thu, 11 May 2023 03:33:17 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from smtpclient.apple (c188-150-165-235.bredband.tele2.se. [188.150.165.235]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h17-20020a197011000000b004eb2f35045bsm1067566lfc.269.2023.05.11.03.33.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 11 May 2023 03:33:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <098D461C-A742-45C4-BD85-B2F9B93F1D07@acm.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.15) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:261559 Archived-At: >> Andrea, does the native compiler somehow miscompile = package-read-from-string? >=20 > Hi, (sorry for being late) not that I'm aware! But in this case the > failer should be deterministic no? Well I haven't studied the native compiler enough to know how many dice = it rolls... >> Since the failure appears to be nondeterministic, perhaps there is a = native-comp build race involved? >=20 > Mmmh, or maybe related to the presence or not of some eln? Could be. I'm going out on a limb here and declare the byte-code = compiler completely innocent in this case. Would you work with the original reporters so that they don't have to = maintain some terrible hack that may be hiding a deeper bug? If anything = turns out to be pointing in my direction I'll be happy to help out.