From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6204: vc-dir always splits the frame Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 14:33:30 -0400 Message-ID: <6yhbm2mnid.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <4jwrv35d7a.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <878w7fa7cr.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274381927 3415 80.91.229.12 (20 May 2010 18:58:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 18:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6204@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 20 20:58:36 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFAx2-00074S-Bs for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 May 2010 20:58:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47812 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFAx1-000448-Or for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 May 2010 14:58:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59467 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFAvW-0003GQ-BP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 May 2010 14:57:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFAvU-0002jw-Hx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 May 2010 14:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45556) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFAvU-0002jn-Ew for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 May 2010 14:57:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFAZG-00089v-HV; Thu, 20 May 2010 14:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 18:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6204 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6204-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6204.127438041931356 (code B ref 6204); Thu, 20 May 2010 18:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6204) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 May 2010 18:33:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFAYs-00089h-Rg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 May 2010 14:33:39 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFAYp-00089c-Nc for 6204@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 May 2010 14:33:36 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFAYl-0002lb-0c; Thu, 20 May 2010 14:33:31 -0400 X-Spook: Albanian Cocaine PET Uzi TELINT Uzbekistan Verisign X-Ran: "$$(#8fyr (Juri Linkov's message of "Thu\, 20 May 2010 00\:31\:00 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 14:34:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:37107 Archived-At: Juri Linkov wrote: > Now after let-binding `pop-up-windows' to nil around the `pop-to-buffer' > call, what if someone might want to restore the old behavior. C-x 2 M-x vc-dir ; or whatever they use for cvs-examine Window handling is obviously very complicated, and I think emacs-devel is a better place to discuss general questions like these. (I have no idea if bug#1806 can ever be closed; I'd rather this one did not go the same way.)