bug#74507: [PATCH] Indent compounds c-ts-mode when { is not BOL

["Jørgen Kvalsvik" <j@lambda.is>]

On 11/29/24 05:56, Yuan Fu wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Nov 24, 2024, at 1:15 AM, Jørgen Kvalsvik <j@lambda.is> wrote:
>>
>> Tags: patch
>>
>> Tags: patch
>>
>>
>> I found that the coumpounded statements are anchored to the wrong object
>> when 1. the compound is not at beginning-of-line and 2. it is not
>> preceeded by a construct such as fndecl/for/if/while/etc., which differs
>> from how c-mode indents it.
>>
>> Non-BOL compound statements is actually quite common with macros and
>> testing frameworks (see the test case). For example, you want this to
>> indent:
>>
>> TEST_CASE(1) {
>>     assert (...);
>> }
>>
>> The heuristic is quite course - it simply checks if the grandparent is
>> function-definition or not, which is really if this node is a top-level
>> sibling in the function body.  If that is the case, the old rules should
>> apply and standalone-parent should be the guide; otherwise, it should be
>> the parent-BOL. This feels a bit shaky but does seem to work well for
>> the test cases, and can be refined in the future.
>>
>> <0001-Indent-compounds-c-ts-mode-when-is-not-BOL.patch>
> 
> Thank you very much! Especially for the test case ;-) What’s the progress of your copyright assignment? Has it completed?

As Eli says, I have submitted the paperwork.

> 
> I’m working on refactoring the indentation rules for c-ts-mode. Let me see if I can integrate this situation into the new rules I’m writing.
> 
> Yuan

Splendid, thanks.