From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39452: [PATCH] vc-git-state fails for filenames with wildcards Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 15:59:41 +0200 Message-ID: <6f06f4c8-17c0-31a7-a6d8-e40686b1e987@yandex.ru> References: <83h802g77h.fsf@gnu.org> <8f427281-510c-30c3-995f-364e22d9c1e2@yandex.ru> <85y2texxso.fsf@gmail.com> <52f47a82-b93e-d9c2-ee94-752b289d4b96@yandex.ru> <83d0ahpkzu.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="129883"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 Cc: npostavs@gmail.com, 39452@debbugs.gnu.org, Wolfgang.Scherer@gmx.de To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 14 15:00:18 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j2bVy-000XbM-5S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 15:00:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39258 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j2bVx-0006jg-4X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 09:00:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58862) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j2bVj-0006ie-CC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 09:00:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j2bVi-0000sQ-Cg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 09:00:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55041) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j2bVi-0000qe-7w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 09:00:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j2bVi-0000CU-5q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 09:00:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 14:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39452 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 39452-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39452.1581688792727 (code B ref 39452); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 14:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39452) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2020 13:59:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32781 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j2bVX-0000Bf-Uq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 08:59:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-f65.google.com ([209.85.208.65]:37221) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j2bVV-0000BS-R5 for 39452@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 08:59:50 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-f65.google.com with SMTP id df17so4547744edb.4 for <39452@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 05:59:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ruSy6j1mblwkP+6eqkiCuhXN1vAROGBxLB1dI0AZ674=; b=pJOvL5bk3rfsBjGj8zoZnp20OTSoaN8y6Pwu9lxCK0TKX6sLvieYJUBQd9BGgkCzFy Mey1/AWy6qJT/yNntKcamxIvfLPw6ayl+WhPh67NgjtnnEBxSrPzGrRztXYIF7LAzerN K4npeUSV5cMWjFEmAteZuwpbtHTHrwisCUbMnPayxdWCWqw+d9magnbmskzmJNLZ1AfF iQMmRzimMQcbKEhf266W6sJonkt4wL8UMT04Lr9peO3O87Zrt9p06KpQ9Sl8tPZ7ewkh 8A4EmEirxDj53s76DmhD57gJEEJZCVizlAklH2mJAZNTyrEszVHbhoumZEQevRTSJzIQ 3vWQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ruSy6j1mblwkP+6eqkiCuhXN1vAROGBxLB1dI0AZ674=; b=Ze5ZdenGYFT9Nf4f4kQOtQoJslaKvMDF+24A2D1odD80kmDrpuFXeIeqgzbUhEQYHX A3tgSehbstipwY3u6C67gRFV59ThVpND54JYcCGI++mngMWsFYnKdkOdAhTvAtZnC/D+ 5srJ1BHFgXBhhhhStAiYmQAp8IsFkbH6NDBfwhNZnCsCOeD5i09hM0Z+xOp0kOFtHbi/ RrP7hWPbOqU9B4vlPpBQgBAphHb3wm9E6egJ30CfTU1XJ/VSx/3SAOVuEJIdFZbXtCc7 WwSbNLM1ipUKS6x5I41dyePfg0kqvKJf6KvRqpcosnN55ac6uD6WrGZVSGTPYLROGIXr 1Yvw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXhfB1tyEIPu9RPRFoqiSMV4ASfZa7gt9wfKG5fgpAPC2//4Afx Zgz2McK6RnN7b0+GRupfggc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx2t+nGmYI8H7Z6vB9rCAlBiVWKy7nHUdYeHCEjo3tuKLc2T6TkMnPVF8tampCvBuwsCVa5uw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f915:: with SMTP id lc21mr3101508ejb.360.1581688783853; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 05:59:43 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.155] ([109.110.245.170]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id i21sm383639edj.33.2020.02.14.05.59.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 05:59:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83d0ahpkzu.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:176050 Archived-At: On 14.02.2020 11:37, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I also tend towards the latter, especially since (AFAIU) we don't > prevent users from using the Git magic signatures in file-name specs > (where it makes sense), in which case we'd need some code to detect > and combine signatures. Could you clarify? What commands and backend actions expect or intentionally allow file-name specs instead of file-names verbatim? Aside from vc-ignore, I suppose. Which won't be affected either way.