From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Phil Sainty Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34657: 26.1; Some erc hook names lack the expected suffix Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 08:30:53 +1300 Message-ID: <6e831de3-9b20-a015-e859-9c778959c0c2@orcon.net.nz> References: <42f6bffbb0e6eb71f87c375a31948970@webmail.orcon.net.nz> <83imx7mdhi.fsf@gnu.org> <83bm2xkxbz.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="7912"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 Cc: 34657@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 27 20:31:55 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gz4vq-0001vn-MC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 20:31:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49682 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gz4vp-0005WS-HL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:31:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53949) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gz4vh-0005WK-LT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:31:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gz4vK-0008Py-Ac for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:31:31 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40838) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gz4v0-00087D-PP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:31:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gz4v0-0001bs-FC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:31:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Phil Sainty Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 19:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34657 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34657-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34657.15512958606071 (code B ref 34657); Wed, 27 Feb 2019 19:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34657) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2019 19:31:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54382 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gz4uy-0001Zd-1h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:31:00 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp-2.orcon.net.nz ([60.234.4.43]:32861) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gz4uv-0001Wd-Ti for 34657@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:30:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [150.107.172.32] (port=33117 helo=[192.168.20.103]) by smtp-2.orcon.net.nz with esmtpa (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gz4ur-0006p7-MU; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 08:30:53 +1300 In-Reply-To: <83bm2xkxbz.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-GB X-GeoIP: NZ X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:155876 Archived-At: On 28/02/19 5:30 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Isn't there some precedent for handling this? Hopefully. If not, I guess I'll raise a separate bug for the fact that renaming defcustoms is problematic, and maybe just add a code comment referencing that to erc.el. > (What is the second annoyance?) A proof-reading failure :) I'd initially worded things differently, before deciding that the issues I was seeing were all connected, so I did cover all the problems I'd observed.