From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56682: feature/improved-locked-narrowing 9dee6df39c: Reworked locked narrowing. Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 16:41:58 +0000 Message-ID: <6c9d91cffcf5e73f4461@heytings.org> References: <166939872890.18950.12581667269687468681@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20221125175209.51166C004B6@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <6c9d91cffc1bfd801530@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13674"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 56682@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 30 17:42:36 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pBISp-0003Ne-JO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 17:42:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pBISc-0005Tz-Dm; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 11:42:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pBISW-0005Ss-Qj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 11:42:16 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pBISI-0007OS-Ug for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 11:42:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pBISI-0001mv-LH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 11:42:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 16:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56682 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 56682-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56682.16724185216852 (code B ref 56682); Fri, 30 Dec 2022 16:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56682) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Dec 2022 16:42:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36013 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pBISH-0001mS-6s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 11:42:01 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:51988) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pBISF-0001mJ-7z for 56682@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 11:41:59 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1672418518; bh=f1yelsKyaU0rpU41l9sSHYZmyNpQDrSItscwRjpma5Q=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=cAdJIi5euoj+d2TD98tzxxcWLKhrKwQ8CnKkgLDrwjt0xhLthFdAw/EOffUT/rDVH YfxaSWmmBuMtZdFMAdReAupK7w5G/IjSteYlM164KNbuUrWUJ3mLD08zZczTiiS8KZ OsQPXqPu9YPtJh+Usf22KHM5FqwIh0VzqVlqvFTyI10dhupM4BhPDLswJpgfHkAMj+ O+Yb+m8GSuCZPPmUjTTKtHH+OeOcKZVOuCrpSUjXudOvlqr3Azjf7NoMOtLZaJKQ7/ IYpTPasQHf1gORGg63JpN/Pju5dcFDaIiEEq1gPyVYWLO6hpAIj8+TSjE+ChTwmf47 6qmZuxgiuTSZQ== In-Reply-To: <6c9d91cffc1bfd801530@heytings.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:252140 Archived-At: > > That depends on the place where 'nlinum--line-number-at-pos' is called, > or IOW where/by which function the narrowing was locked, or IOW again > which tag was used to unlock the narrowing. > Sorry for the typo: I meant "which tag was used to _lock_ the narrowing".