From: "Andreas Röhler" <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de>
To: Noam Postavsky <npostavs@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de>, 25117@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#25117: 25.1.90; Result of called-interactively-p differs WRT file contents
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 20:52:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b47eed5-c31a-7b44-5d87-9d7768606ef7@easy-emacs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM-tV-_q=vXHywUagZHc-TQXWhSXeS_vnSn9QH6HnppiuCTcYw@mail.gmail.com>
On 05.12.2016 20:34, Noam Postavsky wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Andreas Röhler
> <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de> wrote:
>>> The difference is lexical-binding: t, also happens at least as far back as
>>> 24.3.
>>
>> Not sure about that. Checked with and without lexical-binding. Seems not
>> making the difference. See png attached - with emacs -Q checked earlier and
>> same result.
> The text doesn't make the difference, it's the buffer-local value of
> the lexical-binding variable that matters.
>
> Having the text in the file affects the value indirectly, see
> https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Specifying-File-Variables.html
Hmm, don't understand. The lexical-binding is t in both files, set in
first line. But example foo behaves differently.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-05 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-05 13:01 bug#25117: 25.1.90; Result of called-interactively-p differs WRT file contents Andreas Röhler
2016-12-05 16:18 ` Michael Heerdegen
2016-12-05 16:58 ` Andreas Röhler
2016-12-05 16:58 ` Michael Heerdegen
2016-12-05 17:18 ` Andreas Röhler
2016-12-05 17:39 ` Michael Heerdegen
2016-12-05 18:23 ` Andreas Röhler
2016-12-05 19:08 ` Noam Postavsky
2016-12-05 19:38 ` Andreas Röhler
2016-12-05 19:34 ` Noam Postavsky
2016-12-05 19:52 ` Andreas Röhler [this message]
2016-12-05 19:51 ` Noam Postavsky
2016-12-05 20:09 ` Andreas Röhler
2019-10-20 21:34 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-10-21 9:15 ` Michael Heerdegen
2019-10-21 12:21 ` Stefan Monnier
2019-10-21 13:21 ` Michael Heerdegen
2022-04-18 11:24 ` bug#25117: 25.1.90; `called-interactively-p' from edebug with lexical-binding always gives nil Lars Ingebrigtsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6b47eed5-c31a-7b44-5d87-9d7768606ef7@easy-emacs.de \
--to=andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de \
--cc=25117@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=michael_heerdegen@web.de \
--cc=npostavs@users.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).