From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51523: 29.0.50; gnus-mime-view-part-externally very slow Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 00:17:27 +0000 Message-ID: <6abcac838b0dd46d94cf@heytings.org> References: <87v91dmcyz.fsf@gnus.org> <7b7f5641fcf9629c6074@heytings.org> <875ytcwxp7.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24180"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 51523@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 01 01:18:15 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mhL1j-00066Z-3j for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 01:18:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34960 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhL1h-0005D9-JI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 20:18:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33592) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhL1W-0005Ct-0J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 20:18:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50020) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhL1V-0003rr-OK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 20:18:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mhL1V-0000BY-Js for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 20:18:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 00:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51523 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 51523-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51523.1635725850674 (code B ref 51523); Mon, 01 Nov 2021 00:18:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51523) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2021 00:17:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33333 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mhL10-0000Ao-Bs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 20:17:30 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:43768) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mhL0y-0000Ag-Gj for 51523@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 20:17:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1635725847; bh=QjolOAMuiX2YbPytxJYMaQ8jX5d4zdJmXe6Oc74en+8=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=IJhphTYnKPToLkLx+j/K3v3bSSYbaKFMaCi4B4FwiNhU/rjTPZ0K3GMHV2HgEuB/I obco0Xf/0YBLTsAWnDUyLqkl35TXpGKkMC/Ityx2GGnQYoMhmYJ9VBz9DA3+McLOpx kudxl7eSyTerAUftPWysm8wHYRIq3YxCQZQ75nBqkiCNR92kFI7UVi8tCEameVepNN qpAKx/E/dqy0p2I8/puHhbfmkcojtvk5P6SuqnQ46MfYyBitwCxTj3Jp95OHTSnJVz mJDv3fqqaJMRdz+0FtMvH/IIXL+YwvJxz487Lz6t/RBuFzRRu7QXgLblumP74J2nSE BRZ4UQEZHphcg== In-Reply-To: <875ytcwxp7.fsf@gnus.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:218731 Archived-At: > > The mailcaps are being parsed on each invocation on purpose to catch > edits. > BTW, does it make sense to parse it on each invocation, even when this happens in a loop? Would it not make sense to cache the result during a limited amount of time?