From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tej Chajed Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25967: 25.1; Support for ImageMagick 7 Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2017 11:17:41 -0500 Message-ID: <6a48dc20-17fc-4e4b-b793-4c37c6bcbcc5@Spark> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="58bae936_41b71efb_73ce" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1488644476 4686 195.159.176.226 (4 Mar 2017 16:21:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2017 16:21:16 +0000 (UTC) To: 25967@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 04 17:21:09 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ckCQc-0000JR-CG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Mar 2017 17:21:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35815 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckCQi-0002RV-HQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Mar 2017 11:21:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35826) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckCQb-0002RF-UL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Mar 2017 11:21:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckCQY-0007FS-Po for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Mar 2017 11:21:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41994) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckCQY-0007FN-Lo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Mar 2017 11:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ckCQY-0000Hc-Fc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Mar 2017 11:21:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Tej Chajed Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2017 16:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 25967 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.14886444241005 (code B ref -1); Sat, 04 Mar 2017 16:21:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Mar 2017 16:20:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40193 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ckCPv-0000G9-Pn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Mar 2017 11:20:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44723) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ckCPu-0000Fx-L5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Mar 2017 11:20:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckCPo-00072G-LX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Mar 2017 11:20:17 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:48047) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckCPo-000729-IK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Mar 2017 11:20:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35687) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckCPn-0002PP-9r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Mar 2017 11:20:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckCPk-00071N-4L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Mar 2017 11:20:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qk0-f177.google.com ([209.85.220.177]:35904) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckCPj-00070j-VC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Mar 2017 11:20:12 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qk0-f177.google.com with SMTP id 1so100212480qkl.3 for ; Sat, 04 Mar 2017 08:20:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version; bh=simfx4Qe2MTWbObNOULmgIAV5YjqNY3Q5EwSrlKQdDk=; b=iLFuczPpNvtF5D7hjAqn/5Hqjj5xGOwBNRc5gPuzXfdrTOrH1eATB3ASxnPOapPLdi uYinJpoOQxzA+b7XL+2NcHNyiJJ/ACVsxJN8su50Yq5ya/oXjUeQGOd9MiQTGlcnn3JD NbPXnjfqOvn+FKQHBvvd+IhD/bJmzY/UQw9H/eMLBAdwb2byncvT4eqe8Kj72cwEiPqJ ZHdXXkjVpRsRw1kc5YKMFSx8phm7v5dgv4tiy+HxR59Wze4cSgmCPQYlqsBngZ8sbxaz NrBCmQyrDn+U7S4O/8LRrrdNsQiQJUvlyuX6pn9GF/H5ExLVMYO9hZf3iwSBUk5L2U9O nyjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39n+QQhh+lzpn2vEFJgNOxb8Ud9lgFEXka2/lNj8aLZdThJSVifD9RF+2zWhyIKSqg== X-Received: by 10.55.110.6 with SMTP id j6mr7945479qkc.67.1488644409269; Sat, 04 Mar 2017 08:20:09 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [2601:184:4500:e8f5:c809:6193:70::] ([2601:184:4500:e8f5:8805:57dd:af73:8d62]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e5sm1687907qtc.6.2017.03.04.08.20.07 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 04 Mar 2017 08:20:08 -0800 (PST) X-Readdle-Message-ID: 6a48dc20-17fc-4e4b-b793-4c37c6bcbcc5@Spark X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:130191 Archived-At: --58bae936_41b71efb_73ce Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Are there plans to upgrade from ImageMagick 6 to 7=3F I ask because I=E2=80= =99m fixing imagemagick support for the Emacs formula in Homebrew (pull =23= 10477) and Homebrew has to depend on the legacy ImageMagick 6 to build Em= acs with ImageMagick support. It looks like there was a brief discussion on emacs-devel about this in a= thread about the 64-bit Windows build, where the belief was that ImageMa= gick 7 is too unstable to use. If this is indeed the case it makes sense = to stick with ImageMagick 6 but I don=E2=80=99t think there was much of a= n explicit discussion about upgrading in that thread. --58bae936_41b71efb_73ce Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
Are there plans = to upgrade from ImageMagick 6 to 7=3F I ask because I=E2=80=99m fixing im= agemagick support for the Emacs formula in Homebrew (pull =2310477) and H= omebrew has to depend on the legacy ImageMagick 6 to build Emacs with Ima= geMagick support.

It looks like there was a brief discussion on emacs-deve= l about this in a thread about the 64-bit Windows build, where the be= lief was that ImageMagick 7 is too unstable to use. If this is indeed the= case it makes sense to stick with ImageMagick 6 but I don=E2=80=99t thin= k there was much of an explicit discussion about upgrading in that thread= .
--58bae936_41b71efb_73ce--