From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steve Purcell Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16116: 24.3.50; smie-indent-close aligns inner closing paren with the outer opening paren Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 08:23:18 +0000 Message-ID: <6B783955-B72E-4876-BCF2-C864F3D74A62@sanityinc.com> References: <87sity96he.fsf@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387009455 24409 80.91.229.3 (14 Dec 2013 08:24:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 08:24:15 +0000 (UTC) To: 16116@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 14 09:24:20 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VrkWK-0003Ug-1P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 09:24:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46459 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrkWJ-0003UR-I1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 03:24:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53832) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrkWA-0003Rd-42 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 03:24:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrkW2-0007kb-Qx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 03:24:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35159) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrkW2-0007kX-Nn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 03:24:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrkW2-0002NT-36 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 03:24:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87sity96he.fsf@yandex.ru> Resent-From: Steve Purcell Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 08:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16116 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 16116-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16116.13870094059093 (code B ref 16116); Sat, 14 Dec 2013 08:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16116) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2013 08:23:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49178 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrkVQ-0002Ma-Ih for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 03:23:24 -0500 Original-Received: from h1189701.stratoserver.net ([85.214.32.38]:49037) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrkVN-0002MP-KE for 16116@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 03:23:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.112] (host86-153-254-0.range86-153.btcentralplus.com [86.153.254.0]) by h1189701.stratoserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16DBA1118002 for <16116@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 09:23:19 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:81929 Archived-At: I agree strongly with Dmitry here. Column zero is fine if the paren is = on its own, but if there are any preceding characters on the line which = have a different logical indent level, as is the case with =93]=94 here, = the indentation for those should dominate. As another example, in the case of javascript, there=92s the idiomatic = function case: something(function() { =85 blah }); and I don=92t think this is inconsistent with the above: unindenting the = =93}=94 relative to the function body will have the right effect without = even needing to consider the =93)=94. -Steve=