From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12507: [debbugs-tracker] Processed: severity 12507 wishlist Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 09:50:00 -0700 Message-ID: <6AE89E4E12C2423DA49CF53F19CF3E81@us.oracle.com> References: <87bogubqjy.fsf@gnu.org><873925ebpd.fsf@gnu.org><87ipb031aj.fsf@kwarm.red-bean.com> <87sja4t48j.fsf@gmail.com><9D98A7802F07462887BCC67BE194243B@us.oracle.com><87haqildr1.fsf@gmail.com><877grduvfz.fsf@gmail.com><87ehlkoobb.fsf@gmail.com><29382156B26B45EE84512961BC10CB44@us.oracle.com> <877grcol5q.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1348937452 31590 80.91.229.3 (29 Sep 2012 16:50:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:50:52 +0000 (UTC) To: "'Thierry Volpiatto'" , <12507@debbugs.gnu.org> Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 29 18:50:57 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TI0Fj-0005to-SO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 18:50:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44645 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TI0Fe-00031y-5a for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:50:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56965) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TI0Fb-00031t-Mv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:50:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TI0Fa-00056B-HR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:50:47 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52524) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TI0Fa-000567-CR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:50:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TI0Fp-0006RI-Uk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:51:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12507 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12507-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12507.134893743224714 (code B ref 12507); Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12507) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Sep 2012 16:50:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33837 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TI0FL-0006QZ-Bz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:50:31 -0400 Original-Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com ([141.146.126.227]:29613) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TI0FJ-0006QR-6e for 12507@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:50:29 -0400 Original-Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id q8TGoAdO031116 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:50:10 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt356.oracle.com (acsmt356.oracle.com [141.146.40.156]) by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8TGo9vA008921 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:50:09 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt110.oracle.com (abhmt110.oracle.com [141.146.116.62]) by acsmt356.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q8TGo7td018067; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:50:07 -0500 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/71.202.147.44) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 09:50:07 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <877grcol5q.fsf@gmail.com> Thread-Index: Ac2eXok5xsILJnIZThGuPx8mpvB+5AAAkkKQ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:65015 Archived-At: > What I want to say is, why writing to buffer "*Bookmarks*", renaming > this buffer to the filename buffer, and then saving it? > Just use find-file-noselect, write data and save. I see. You're talking only about the first arg of `with-current-buffer'. I thought you were talking about `write-file' vs `save-buffer' and claiming that there were two writes with the former. Yes, of course. There is no need to use a different buffer, *Bookmarks*, instead of the return value of `find-file-noselect'. I thought we had already covered that. There still might be a reason to use `write-file' instead of `save-buffer'. But as I say, what's important is to decide about whether to allow backing up (and visiting the file).