From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10461: emacs is not a macro-editor Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:34:01 -0500 Message-ID: <69d39v35t2.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <20120109072515.90575jbeaf6l178c@webmail.lip6.fr> <20120203020554.35844p809idywgsg@webmail.lip6.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328308474 32593 80.91.229.3 (3 Feb 2012 22:34:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 22:34:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: andre.desnoyers@upmc.fr To: 10461@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 03 23:34:33 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RtRiC-0007tR-PH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:34:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59616 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtRiC-0002nE-3V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:34:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44295) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtRi9-0002n1-4h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:34:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtRi7-0006Qc-UX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:34:29 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49242) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtRi7-0006QY-Rk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:34:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtRig-000672-GB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:35:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10461 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10461-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10461.132830848023464 (code B ref 10461); Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10461) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Feb 2012 22:34:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52865 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtRiJ-00066P-T0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:34:40 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:53127 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtRiI-00066I-49 for 10461@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:34:38 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtRhh-0002b6-TW; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:34:02 -0500 X-Spook: USCOI Leuken-Baden Sears Tower Aldergrove Attorney X-Ran: VocE=zCJ6k1.?;4vvVuYLEP\)W<{L[v1E*gF*p@JG_,+M'UWB9k!{'<' X-Hue: black X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <20120203020554.35844p809idywgsg@webmail.lip6.fr> (andre desnoyers's message of "Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:05:54 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56454 Archived-At: (Please keep 10461@debbugs cc'd) andre.desnoyers@upmc.fr wrote: > I have forgotten that : > in my problem, file is build with very long lines (frequently 500 > bytes) on Mac Intosh. There are very important difference between > logical lines (in file) and physical lines (in window). > the X-windows has not good position after execution my macro when two > consecutive matches are very distant and require a refresh of the > screen. Then I imagine this is the same issue as http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7046 ie visual-line-mode can affect the way macros behave.