From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8865: 24.0.50; `display-buffer' does not respect `pop-up-frames' Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:11:36 -0700 Message-ID: <68E985ED37824BE799A9C01162553E22@us.oracle.com> References: <4DF7B1BB.6050704@gmx.at> <4DF87A4F.60704@gmx.at> <5F95025D0ABE4561A305F30293828F38@us.oracle.com> <4DF8DD1E.8080004@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308162447 17351 80.91.229.12 (15 Jun 2011 18:27:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:27:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8865@debbugs.gnu.org To: "'martin rudalics'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 15 20:27:22 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWuoE-0004iV-6v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:27:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39550 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWuoC-0001Bk-Oi for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:27:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55945) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWteL-0004on-8G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:13:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWteJ-0007f7-3O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:13:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34589) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWteI-0007f3-Uo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:13:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWteI-0000iO-ES; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:13:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8865 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8865-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8865.13081579232676 (code B ref 8865); Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8865) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jun 2011 17:12:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWtdF-0000gk-7n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:12:03 -0400 Original-Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWtdB-0000gU-RS for 8865@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:11:54 -0400 Original-Received: from rtcsinet22.oracle.com (rtcsinet22.oracle.com [66.248.204.30]) by rcsinet10.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.2) with ESMTP id p5FHBj9K003085 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:11:47 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt357.oracle.com (acsmt357.oracle.com [141.146.40.157]) by rtcsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5FHBhSp028201 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:11:44 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt012.oracle.com (abhmt012.oracle.com [141.146.116.21]) by acsmt357.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p5FHBbF4022023; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:11:37 -0500 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/130.35.178.194) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:11:37 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <4DF8DD1E.8080004@gmx.at> Thread-Index: AcwreYbUNBhQS/NESLqENYaurkQx7AABKQmg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6090 X-Source-IP: rtcsinet22.oracle.com [66.248.204.30] X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090204.4DF8E7D3.0184:SCFSTAT5015188,ss=1,fgs=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:13:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:47194 Archived-At: > With the redefinition of `display-buffer-normalize-specifiers-1'... > subsequently doing C-x 4 b pops up the buffer in a new frame. Yes, it does. I was mistaken about that (I confused this bug with another). But are you proposing to redefine `display-buffer-normalize-specifiers-1' that way for Emacs, or are you just proposing that I redefine it locally for myself that way? The latter would not address (fix) the bug. Users (not just me) should not have `C-x 4 f' etc. change its behavior - those commands should still use another frame (for non-nil `pop-up-frames'), as they have always done. If you implement this change in Emacs, then yes, please close the bug, as your redefinition seems to fix it.