--=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Tags: patch Re-write the NEWS entry of apply-rpartially. --=-=-= Content-Type: text/patch Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=0005-Better-explanation-for-apply-rpartially-in-NEWS.patch From 339b0ed82dbc0430ce71294f04a53547f532c1af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daanturo Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 23:24:37 +0700 Subject: [PATCH] Better explanation for apply-rpartially in NEWS * etc/NEWS (Lisp Changes in Emacs 28.1): Better explanation for apply-rpartially --- etc/NEWS | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/etc/NEWS b/etc/NEWS index be30d6c859..a06456035c 100644 --- a/etc/NEWS +++ b/etc/NEWS @@ -2911,8 +2911,8 @@ The former is now declared obsolete. +++ ** New function 'apply-rpartially'. -Functionally equivalent to 'apply-partially' but arguments are aligned -to the right instead. +This is almost similar to 'apply-partially' except that the last +arguments are fixed instead of first ones. +++ ** New function 'syntax-class-to-char'. -- 2.32.0 --=-=-=-- On 7/2/21 1:45 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: daanturo >> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 00:06:35 +0700 >> Cc: "Basil L. Contovounesios" >> >> (Please ignore my immediately precededing email, I'm sorry for not being >> used to sending patches by mailing list.) > I see no problems in the preceding email, so I think you have nothing > to apologize for. > >> +@defun apply-rpartially func &rest args >> +This function does mostly the same as @code{apply-partially}, but >> +@var{args} are aligned to the right of @var{func}'s parameters >> +instead. > I don't think this explains the purpose of the function clearly > enough. The documentation of apply-partially doesn't mention any > "alignment", so it's hard to understand what you want to say here. > Can you think of a better description? > >> +@example >> +@group >> +(defalias 'square (apply-rpartially #'expt 2) >> + "Return argument squared.") >> +@end group >> +@group >> +(square 3) >> + @result{} 9 >> +@end group >> +@end example > IMO, the example could be more revealing if you could contrast > apply-rpartially with apply-partially. > >> ++++ >> +** New function 'apply-rpartially'. >> +Funcionally equivalent to 'apply-partially' but arguments are aligned >> +to the right instead. > After we find a good wording for the manual, we should think how to > reword the NEWS entry accordingly. > > Thanks. -- Daanturo.