From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#4710: 23.1.50; Bad display of underlines crossing line boundaries Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 07:05:06 -0700 Message-ID: <67910CA13BCC481CB3F0E99477C8AC97@us.oracle.com> References: <4E75B5FE.1030208@dogan.se><4515BD8DE6284A249A67403FC1292685@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1316527580 20674 80.91.229.12 (20 Sep 2011 14:06:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:06:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 'Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen' , 4710@debbugs.gnu.org To: "'Stefan Monnier'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 20 16:06:15 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R60xh-000872-Tr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:06:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52703 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R60xh-0006cT-CY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:06:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34720) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R60xZ-0006az-99 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:06:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R60xP-0005Lq-SK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:06:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46963) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R60xP-0005Ll-Nc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:05:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R612M-0003Qr-Cw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:11:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 4710 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 4710-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B4710.131652782913153 (code B ref 4710); Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 4710) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Sep 2011 14:10:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R611p-0003Q6-4Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:10:29 -0400 Original-Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com ([148.87.113.117]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R611m-0003Py-Cr for 4710@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:10:28 -0400 Original-Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id p8KE5Gc0024000 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:05:18 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt357.oracle.com (acsmt357.oracle.com [141.146.40.157]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8KE5FHE013617 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:05:15 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt105.oracle.com (abhmt105.oracle.com [141.146.116.57]) by acsmt357.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p8KE5A3o016999; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:05:10 -0500 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.34.188) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 07:05:09 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: Acx3PR4uR87ieVgIRx+kY8UL6HIl9QAXzrHA X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109 X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090205.4E789D9E.015A:SCFMA922111,ss=1,re=-4.000,fgs=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:11:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:51536 Archived-At: > > Not doing so could give the impression that there is > > actually a break (change) in the face attributes when > > there is not. If you do that, then perhaps some additional > > display artifact should convey that - > > e.g., perhaps a different fringe marker. > > Again, you seem to be confused: I'm specifically talking about "face > continuations", i.e. ways to express the fact that the face continues > rather than being broken. That's the whole point of the two ? in > my example. Please make sure there's an actual disagreement before > jumping on your keyboard ;-) Great, so you jumped on your keyboard to express your violent agreement. ;-) At any rate, it looks like your and my proposals for such a line-wrapping-without-breaking case, while perhaps interesting, do not correspond to the bug reported. It appears that the OP was indeed about face extension across (hard) line breaks into indented text on the next line. That was what my original response was to: If it hurts, don't do it; and let's not assume that whitespace should not show the face attributes of the adjacent text just because it represents indentation.