From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47969: 28.0.50; Losing minibuffer focus in trying M-x command Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 12:29:27 +0000 Message-ID: <677a04021b6d6347bbd2@heytings.org> References: <24706.50397.801563.461736@capuchin.co.uk> <7ee648e84004b7745946@heytings.org> <24709.3891.605753.919647@capuchin.co.uk> <677a04021b23aa2d7c9f@heytings.org> <24709.24669.871737.299611@capuchin.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2799"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 47969@debbugs.gnu.org To: Robert Marshall Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 25 14:30:38 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1laduI-0000c8-QK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 14:30:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46612 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1laduH-0000NR-Sv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:30:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39356) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ladtj-0000NI-0H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:30:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58878) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ladti-0004yL-0W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:30:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ladth-0005H8-Qc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:30:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 12:30:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47969 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47969-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47969.161935377920226 (code B ref 47969); Sun, 25 Apr 2021 12:30:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47969) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Apr 2021 12:29:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42191 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ladtH-0005G6-37 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:29:39 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:52514) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ladtA-0005Fs-Vg for 47969@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:29:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1619353768; bh=F545J0rKqY61m1OKhDGIwbjJ+pUdaZ8YPVK8RnSj9XM=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=MnWp2StP7Th4AL7Qu+SfowEeR7ZFKU6FU9SuY2m4qogupRTzxV8LwWy5sgIgNUZEi P0cSmxMkkHmfN2Apq/D2+wM0FzhW98bZ30ErvD4Grmb8NNJP9KDIg54nCpp3BVwGh+ U2EqaAOxxhvJkt/kuLzBClHGUirIMQQXlswktapHpWIEuRzBNk6rJc7J3ghH9Pb2fi 5cJ7yCVi4D7fjKNShuoNfd2ylPDug1k+/S0YPH/II+nM16oW7jMj6G6a2weXAIiGpW Ot+JhXzLMfmvriTecuT2Re7l4HyD0EAx2r0V/GD8ktbj0ZglWb8xDoMMo5J/EhTaNK l1+wj/HG/qOGg== In-Reply-To: <24709.24669.871737.299611@capuchin.co.uk> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:204870 Archived-At: >> Could you confirm that this correctly reproduces what you see? > > Brilliant! Yes that's precisely what I'm seeing > Thanks for your confirmation, I'll investigate this issue.