From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11325: 24.1.50; regression: bad order for `substitute-command-keys' with keymap Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 21:09:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <66bde929-3dd7-4eed-b006-2e6e7a5abe30@default> References: <87a9dza7gl.fsf@building.gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392009018 19715 80.91.229.3 (10 Feb 2014 05:10:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:10:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11325@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 10 06:10:24 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WCj8R-00019C-Ca for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 06:10:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53432 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCj8Q-0002Cn-Nh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:10:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55563) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCj8E-0002Cc-Vx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:10:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCj86-0006ZQ-CW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:10:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47774) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCj86-0006ZG-AL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:10:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCj85-00084A-Rd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:10:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11325 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 11325-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11325.139200895330944 (code B ref 11325); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11325) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2014 05:09:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33560 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCj7I-000832-VB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:09:13 -0500 Original-Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:42323) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCj7G-00082s-Qa for 11325@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:09:11 -0500 Original-Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id s1A599gh018289 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:09:10 GMT Original-Received: from userz7021.oracle.com (userz7021.oracle.com [156.151.31.85]) by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s1A5987n014677 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:09:09 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0005.oracle.com (abhmp0005.oracle.com [141.146.116.11]) by userz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s1A598tq024854; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:09:08 GMT In-Reply-To: <87a9dza7gl.fsf@building.gnus.org> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.8 (707110) [OL 12.0.6680.5000 (x86)] X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85202 Archived-At: > > Then it was broken differently in Emacs 24, which puts `e..f' > > first in the list, but restores `0..9' to its rightful place. >=20 > Isn't the main problem here that it even tries to do a two-letter > range? You could argue that also. But there is no ambiguity in such a notation, given that if `e .. f' were a multiple-key sequence then it would be handled differently (via `Prefix Key'). Anyway, that is not what this bug report is about. But yes, if we got rid of that notation then presumably `e' and `f' would go back to their rightful places alphabetically. > Seems awfully odd to me: Being out of order is odd. That is what this bug thread is about.