From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56682: Fix the long lines font locking related slowdowns Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 11:36:26 +0000 Message-ID: <65cb7c73fdceb7548382@heytings.org> References: <837d46mjen.fsf@gnu.org> <8a3eaeef01be5bfaa5ef@heytings.org> <05388e8d8812bfa3695d@heytings.org> <83v8rf5894.fsf@gnu.org> <65cb7c73fd4a999cca00@heytings.org> <83k07u6dkm.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23103"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 56682@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 30 13:37:13 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oHkmO-0005qB-NP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 13:37:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46716 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oHkmN-0002rV-O0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 07:37:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51032) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oHkmE-0002pl-MB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 07:37:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44426) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oHkmE-0002gS-Df for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 07:37:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oHkmE-0000bb-5t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 07:37:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 11:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56682 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 56682-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56682.16591809892281 (code B ref 56682); Sat, 30 Jul 2022 11:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56682) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jul 2022 11:36:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34175 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oHklg-0000ai-OH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 07:36:28 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:59022) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oHklf-0000ab-Ej for 56682@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 07:36:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1659180986; bh=+DVgcqEIbE4Dpxsgqs4jJ/bPoTFk2zRrLwcNYTUgjYg=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=w+FP0WA1EkPDvgApcN1WJiIoFi4nyIg0wSzS3fGO7H/hUsV+gCaPXW6I2M21Uv+Mp BAy3zjZR7Tll3PjZwhWxbSQdk473v+lx2qt6o9VGI40F0qVfmJMZU1oKUTzfR1cd+X Z2+mhLmHqCUE7w1RVsZHmg4JXt4DHqLXNfy1lxyWyWP8B0LwVvN6KVLW02ppKUd+8g y94XcEiii4CwLiofc06AMJT0YsbG4Yz54TUAvE/zDx4V8AIY+C9V48h+78qo8R4GaL V9miLnhueJH1MN7FXwQUxlUyclYHi6U7GeUsc9rw2XOC2W1haoPI0vwTRiuJnEfNHX rKRyGM8NRPOpw== In-Reply-To: <83k07u6dkm.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:238256 Archived-At: >> is apparently not enough, because "2-3" seems to install an >> integer-or-marker-p check on the third argument, which raises a >> (wrong-type-argument integer-or-marker-p nil) or (wrong-type-argument >> integer-or-marker-p t) error when narrow-to-region is called from >> byte-compiled code. > > Where's the integer-or-marker-p test installed and/or called from? > It is called when narrow-to-region, which has its own opcode, is called from byte-compiled code. But I have no idea where it is installed.