From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38992: 27.0.60; when enabled, fido-mode seems to break vc-git-grep Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 16:17:15 +0200 Message-ID: <658de140-d00b-2a4f-baa5-f261a135410e@yandex.ru> References: <288610218.111246.1578330546916@office.mailbox.org> <84206f04-6947-1440-9138-a950dfecb63a@yandex.ru> <2c5f6c44-7ca3-f1c9-d18d-3bf0d65548b9@yandex.ru> <62da5d4c-2db8-864e-0d08-ed751ff82c0b@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="125308"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 Cc: 38992@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 05 15:18:35 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j9rKc-000WU4-Qj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 15:18:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49900 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j9rKb-0005lp-SI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 09:18:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60684) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j9rK7-0005OV-1l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 09:18:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j9rK5-0007GO-VG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 09:18:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36424) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j9rK5-0007GJ-S0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 09:18:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j9rK5-0004R4-Nv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 09:18:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 14:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38992 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38992-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38992.158341785517007 (code B ref 38992); Thu, 05 Mar 2020 14:18:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38992) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Mar 2020 14:17:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42397 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j9rJe-0004QF-Vj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 09:17:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f53.google.com ([209.85.221.53]:42137) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j9rJd-0004Q4-0v for 38992@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 09:17:33 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f53.google.com with SMTP id v11so5269081wrm.9 for <38992@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 06:17:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k7lO9EcC9fuqOGj+GjYEVc+OWQwm6+ubmrfHNFWIQFE=; b=pumRgSTOeJ4UzlA3r9Mm0fWHtK/Fi393RnF0dP4THoxw6oUHi2CagG9Yii+970fZnu Y2SnB3aVgWm1uxG04WPDGA8OsphIhFSCrP2vl3a/nFvoOzoSsQnUPrEUAtUtMBbbWLDb 2oO/jSOP1gNcHuoSxQ6EyhuKIQ6/db7aSOTOIvtOJJQDJ7ld179zEtjUkT57ECjH4Rpa dcxrhdBHyVZ1nYd0JpFDkAcohMCRqkqs604ncPjTdaObNwKEL8LLMqzyWd9O51KOVUl2 GwG+7pleY6sni5mtscrV9xkIaWo/q0RRHLu863vI2iwzgOxCdtvNS5i63m/VmDyraikt 5QOg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=k7lO9EcC9fuqOGj+GjYEVc+OWQwm6+ubmrfHNFWIQFE=; b=k42pKEBtPh5Fw4/2jkqtPk+wou1mZM9bHzR7Rfna+OIMqHKJTT5fHtUAiDFc6aiPHR Em3MQcRl1DWaAcwQybCT3h46MqGaHF/+qoUbo9Cnjx1P27k0u1ba2C7/4R7dlUdCfSgk JfAyaRoRkOlqZ3fPV6sQP5Tq2txO+8MoLO0xCqEI6Nx7x7HHKyzDLk3PPF43v612RzS8 ADVTyUii+T8dBgfj2G4BhNecu6zMKcU6Ee1dei/haUTzOLZ0nE3t5/9aDz/UhUqGRImB EUT5g2jUC3WYW/rVUACA47eDVO6uqWOxSFrqRYZLeUi6KsIu2uOM5Mj3iLMgfBfZLXUp qdFA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3hxaP4Lkyq7jOWcKUQ8EFyr5uMadKIQBBcbt4QsDvH008TDutu HtR5CUXxNyawxJRL+W7wND3EgY8h X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtlZSFpDgMt1G0tlSvKaZtVDgz5rKZlwzoFOqPhyt1N+xfo0AnAuT9eNp2fMb8kbG2LGzWE6g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1246:: with SMTP id j6mr8642476wrx.253.1583417846621; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 06:17:26 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.155] ([109.110.245.170]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id u25sm9452595wml.17.2020.03.05.06.17.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Mar 2020 06:17:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:176908 Archived-At: On 05.03.2020 16:10, João Távora wrote: > Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 2:03 PM Dmitry Gutov wrote: > >> How about 'M-x exit-minibuffer RET'? :-) If it's indeed a rare situation. > > M-x doesn't work within an active minibuffer, does it? Seems to work fine in this situation. Starting with 'emacs -Q', no extra config on my part except 'M-x fido-mode'. > Anyway, it should > be rare among all the possible UIs and situations out there, > but once you hit one, it's likely to hurt you repeatedly. So let's not > be needlessly strict. I don't want to be too strict, but I also don't want users shooting themselves in the foot. Or to feel that I can't rely on REQUIRE-MATCH when calling completing-read in a program. >> I will recuse myself by saying I have no opinion on C-u. > > Then I will take over this investigation ;-) Thank you.