From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: sanette-linux Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23847: 24.5; dired icon too large Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 19:20:21 +0200 Message-ID: <64cb795b-61be-d9b5-3823-1723e0c450e7@laposte.net> References: <576E5215.2050405@laposte.net> <9rtwgeaa5z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <55oa6m2yiw.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1470763581 1893 195.159.176.226 (9 Aug 2016 17:26:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 17:26:21 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 Cc: 23847@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 09 19:26:14 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bXAn8-0000JU-6p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 19:26:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36971 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXAn5-0008OM-0p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 13:26:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38485) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXAi9-0002Va-8L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 13:21:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXAi5-0000bI-Vk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 13:21:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36040) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXAi5-0000b1-RT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 13:21:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bXAi5-0004CU-Ld for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 13:21:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: sanette-linux Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 17:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23847 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23847-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23847.147076322716087 (code B ref 23847); Tue, 09 Aug 2016 17:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23847) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2016 17:20:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33337 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bXAhX-0004BO-HD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 13:20:27 -0400 Original-Received: from smtpoutz29.laposte.net ([194.117.213.104]:45333 helo=smtp.laposte.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bXAhU-0004BF-OA for 23847@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 13:20:25 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp.laposte.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lpn-prd-vrout017 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E88DA0150B for <23847@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 19:20:23 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=laposte.net; s=mail0; t=1470763223; bh=wJvOREYy7YchJU/blcMLPJlpRqy/JpV5a9hTBl5J+/g=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=U0ITOxfqov1XzPq++u4aawVxaf25Xh2VchiXB4skpY/TZnUmix3ra5eqopPWHBTo9 Dp0wLKnn4LyJCOw6yMrejJQDHlXKDBskG2TBJ72CGjDjLth1F5R0jLPgZi/qE9o5mU DMUr43o9gi5r3imR5SdbNabcjdo39m3LHBU3+wTf1VDu1y8yRSVNb1al4Bsn6B7o2e DZ7zM81xGVU8YWq3Cw0bEWNT836UgzabvRxGnFnm6Xg6FnNsYkzEDzcX/8NY+Scv8P nZd9/EfrYCGau1jLxGSebwjXYGkLHpqkLCF70t0JzkE6YsbPmWFQ9RGLJo+NZ1nedW FL8OsnbcZxRKw== Original-Received: from smtp.laposte.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lpn-prd-vrout017 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A72A01A7A for <23847@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 19:20:23 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from lpn-prd-vrin003 (lpn-prd-vrin003.laposte [10.128.63.4]) by lpn-prd-vrout017 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3A2A0150B for <23847@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 19:20:23 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from lpn-prd-vrin003 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lpn-prd-vrin003 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79BAF48DE90 for <23847@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 19:20:23 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.18] (sud35-2-82-225-106-147.fbx.proxad.net [82.225.106.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lpn-prd-vrin003 (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12F5948DE3F; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 19:20:22 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <55oa6m2yiw.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-VR-SrcIP: 82.225.106.147 X-VR-FullState: 0 X-VR-Score: 0 X-VR-Cause-1: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeeluddrtddugdduleculddtuddrfeeltddrtddtmdcutefuodet X-VR-Cause-2: ggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfntefrqffuvffgnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucehtddtnecu X-VR-Cause-3: necujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtgfesthekredttdefheenucfhrhhomhepshgrnhgvthhtvgdq X-VR-Cause-4: lhhinhhugicuoehsrghnvghtthgvqdhlihhnuhigsehlrghpohhsthgvrdhnvghtqeenucffohhmrghi X-VR-Cause-5: nhepghhnohhmvgdrohhrghenucfkphepkedvrddvvdehrddutdeirddugeejnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhho X-VR-Cause-6: uggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhhvghloheplgduledvrdduieekrddtrddukegnpdhinhgvthepkedvrddv X-VR-Cause-7: vdehrddutdeirddugeejpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepshgrnhgvthhtvgdqlhhinhhugieslhgrphhoshht X-VR-Cause-8: vgdrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhopehrghhmsehgnhhurdhorhhg X-VR-AvState: No X-VR-State: 0 X-VR-State: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:122020 Archived-At: Le 27/06/2016 à 21:59, Glenn Morris a écrit : > Actually looking at > https://developer.gnome.org/icon-naming-spec/ > there does not seem to be anything better to use. > So maybe Emacs needs to explicitly set the size for Gtk svg icons? > I don't know. additional information: this is indeed related to the scale=2 setting in the gnome display setting: if I set scale=1, then the opendir icon has the right size (meaning the same size as the other icons, which are of course very tiny for me with the setting scale=1) So, for some reason when scale=2, the icon sizes are multiplied by 2 (this is normal behaviour) except for the opendir icon which is multiplied by 4. Maybe this means that scale is applied twice for this "named" icon ? Just a guess.