From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37630: 27.0.50; image-mode-fit-frame doesn't Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 11:25:05 +0200 Message-ID: <64b8489c-990b-1054-5301-488e0379befb@gmx.at> References: <83v9t34kxv.fsf@gnu.org> <877e5hb3yo.fsf@gnus.org> <01C6CC54-E926-470A-9736-41498FC7A25F@gnu.org> <871rvp86ks.fsf@gnus.org> <83sgo4zfnf.fsf@gnu.org> <0d475083-0f51-ed60-95f4-970fa67df241@gmx.at> <83mueby4z2.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="28887"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 37630@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 08 11:28:47 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHlnS-0007PF-OP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 11:28:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52898 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHlnP-0000eS-SZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 05:28:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35972) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHlkq-0006sY-E3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 05:26:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHlkp-0000r4-7R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 05:26:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40747) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHlkp-0000qr-3s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 05:26:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHlko-0002gi-UX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 05:26:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 09:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37630 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37630-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37630.157052672010248 (code B ref 37630); Tue, 08 Oct 2019 09:26:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37630) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2019 09:25:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49562 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHlk7-0002fD-Jd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 05:25:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:39391) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHlk5-0002em-CP for 37630@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 05:25:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1570526707; bh=Zct6Hh7oKVujLttYA6724jMifjNmlnCK+dARU6KgbLI=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=PkNlE5xr7H4nxq7RVf+NNOu8gQH/2tK0mOrAQ+eUXzQ4VHBnbnC0G/naRlWyZGnMD vHuEF4BI7d9UqcgaJ06g6sbCRMhHpGfz/yPezlWKJ4nB9epwEgr4KTF1MYNAg5CLK2 TVTb2Cn9DnwlSz1UoTPa09alqwMJUyZmN5a+8Ajw= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.5.8]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MtOKi-1hxUjc3xfC-00uuHF; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 11:25:07 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83mueby4z2.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: de-AT X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:dyfkqbclBjXX7QXbKv/9HkMXQdrKx8YzoGFRutTXb1tHQBjk8g8 lB+wAhgARqaj6UqZreQggMO8gRaKE8KcJF8/AOV4K90R3lDwkgbS1tvl4iVVegWeHdtyxtd IjMx3U8tVV/tJ1LwU8et2nNuMuyeBQXm/XM0XcPlNlH7FP0sE2U+9tMx+NgCQNoS8hFCzol aD+TgHCF0iFNZJfZZO9Qw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:PAp3nJgDxVg=:EYxCBk27Gep5LuT2GH5AHx 72fzH3JlXcIIfAdCqHcjxRKdjwTGjXaYmmirPqQsZY01zI5SnxBzna2BOJwJdCp/QxjHY0St8 RoQWA8gsOp3xWDxqx0DNnZ4qfxrTugIbZTACl536gxE5ujQDj/+Qi7w00jDTEd4lPRbNzJqDg WrloBy0EZJbA7v/xh9eqK8v3ZKVNXFN3fK75iiPmXPKSURJu1Q9ewEGyAP4TKDSa+3CH3PCmE SUF4e4+V+QkZRg4XoZjmgpP3OjUx0UuFhs+7CVa8LJ+SQpbY12DqfcFB/Cx3xKgv7RKfbiUON muvS0ewXILsBfU1iq6y4ZvGQc5SiZIlG96SkKhvvOi+Qq/n303eERU3Rt7q8JJ1+64U5C1vmi 86H9cqwmyGvRi3GTNDWqeATcG4Kv8LjEL9W5IoFrbphGRFMfforcaAmgzqhJOss9mTvO1FtR1 S0GwrvwAvGJNK7PVUFP7TCMEO78YHYRCJmwSlB7GBRhFpnDwSe7YIugfJuXClfSX9QJAS8tbA VNJ+ixRkHqvawaDCEZGWWxX34HmcTOvUB9eOTDIrIVpVRciwBgMkqWvxtX0YKXi4k5guRHye2 +W4bA07Zxx8UywxNnKBgorBVSpp3cI9gS7rVGmfDNmtRb6ix3jELoKfM8ohbSU3fbnvzmmL3u MF3bN6GxQMiPwGGtJCiQZG+n5rF4si9WyGuCRuipQUGbpTIZZ4rYbkSmhYfTyqsg3t7OMEJHV Q4lNdTn8jSejTSPjSaoacTIW+TiKHBr3xcmGEADRTlauxtyLOoPBxQEmpZ4/nTD2VHz412TJ X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:168627 Archived-At: > Which JPG image did you use? One of me, in the mountains. You mean we should settle on the same image if we find one we both can display. >> Looking at the code of 'image-mode-fit-frame' I can't find anything >> wrong with >> >> (set-frame-height frame (+ (ceiling (cdr size)) >> height (- inner-height))) >> >> and would be surprised if this failed unless some frame properties >> changed in between the 'frame-height' and the 'window-inside-edges' >> calls. Maybe it's also the strange saving modus that interferes in >> your setups. The >> >> (list (cons (frame-width) >> (frame-height)) >> >> doesn't look like TRT when FRAME is not the selected frame but so far >> I have no idea how this code is supposed to behave at all. In either >> case, make sure the 'image-mode-saved-params' parameter is nil before >> calling 'image-mode-fit-frame'. > > My recipe is in "emacs -Q", I'm using emacs -Q too but which ... > so I guess this condition holds? ... condition do you mean here? martin