From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41531: 27.0.91; Better handle asynchronous eldoc backends Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 21:32:33 +0300 Message-ID: <64585842-bd25-8610-153a-2143750e3ee8@yandex.ru> References: <875zckuet9.fsf@gmail.com> <87sgecssch.fsf@gmail.com> <87tuynsdp6.fsf@gmail.com> <5d768a69-3574-10c5-e80a-8ab77ec60462@yandex.ru> <87h7umop62.fsf@gmail.com> <671983cf-e4f5-f128-541b-ceac793f35e5@yandex.ru> <877dvfiofy.fsf@gmail.com> <3211602a-ccc6-aa53-d192-77f27c2060ce@yandex.ru> <5a258c2b-39e7-76d7-0867-181ae3171710@yandex.ru> <7f1ec72b-2608-ad60-573d-528d22671ff6@yandex.ru> <7cc227db-f748-67d8-83b3-75502b9dbd9f@yandex.ru> <87k0zef3br.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24537"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 Cc: 41531@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , andreyk.mad@gmail.com To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 08 20:33:25 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jtEsm-0006Gt-VS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 20:33:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34058 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jtEsl-0001oN-NS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 14:33:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47566) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jtEsQ-0001nx-99 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 14:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55749) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jtEsP-0004e8-Ux for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 14:33:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jtEsP-0004z2-SE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 14:33:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 18:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41531 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41531-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41531.159423316319130 (code B ref 41531); Wed, 08 Jul 2020 18:33:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41531) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jul 2020 18:32:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39062 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jtEs6-0004yU-RQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 14:32:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f41.google.com ([209.85.128.41]:40918) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jtEs5-0004yC-G1 for 41531@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 14:32:41 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f41.google.com with SMTP id f139so4220285wmf.5 for <41531@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 11:32:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k9uBWhAimbshRgi1fv6bV7CWP09g1xda4vsB9LaCEgc=; b=SpRVbLgCp4ETBEuN6cNLxQBJiRG5Mn7jr7YishikJPj2fvmYrjAnOfu8rU3Hkj+D6i 0IHBKw0mdmTdS4FCU0fnsC5AXbyRartWHHFIMLjLXrMtRhyOGmsKidimX1nByt3r4+S5 MKWeNAVUc4sl5YCSXKHnqkWOPYl6bzWuwTKwmkHHbnzRP/f9r6H+N4tTmI5LC1m3gXe1 cqo9dKM2Z5s0UfWD4VFiSD6wqZdhg0RVA1XRiaoBgi8YQdk9aZO0nbhH6OUuh2stFUjp ESKZAlfXDI3EK+/0pUs1F4ZLoSvGzHUe32P+iD3EQl6LkpRlpwJRSzHNs+bZeE1buAmT CQQg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=k9uBWhAimbshRgi1fv6bV7CWP09g1xda4vsB9LaCEgc=; b=QxwAS/ZMVeGho92MWTglA2xWUYo7/fgkiLDGLWyrJA3yjDA4SFecJsF62A5k6Av+Mr YcDxB5tfJOAmd/l1eZbBl1P5Wd6qoQh2vkjYQQPvE+MtcMRNVH8oubqHEppYev2E4GF9 3Md27346ShT9HBdS96vxIBfLeA19hD6FG7ID0zERHBXRO4ROTCD2cA9zUTP40A4aCujF Ezf/Es2Fu85pM/oKZ7491NUwAGOyiWmk+X+tmkj5aF5IycbCF0ktvNAJIBCqKIOdkXda y2MP6HHL3SehzSnJfv2fX6sq+20Qtgh8cwaeMFe9a1SNgmXhdpZkA34JYH9j6MF4PXS8 wf9w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531fO4LQGt32zfdE11zVEYzEjCLGFXXHcA3VCwzrz2S595Q4w/pZ hFI6+IBVKynfz5jwySKWJlg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxW6F375OUfvUioNHAF7JCsM+DLknkWGdK5hDeavjE8DBE+ROoZB+KFCyRtDTGrNBRoMhJNhg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:8117:: with SMTP id c23mr10129681wmd.157.1594233155428; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 11:32:35 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.3] ([66.205.73.129]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id h84sm1015731wme.22.2020.07.08.11.32.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Jul 2020 11:32:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87k0zef3br.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:182849 Archived-At: On 08.07.2020 18:12, João Távora wrote: > Please stop falsely claiming I "ignored" you review. This is distateful > and offensive. Not as offensive as having one's writing ignored. > I replied to both emails: neither were a code review like Eli's and Stefan's were, which were much easier to follow. Both Stefan and Eli were too busy to do an in-depth review. And I now know better than to do one for you either. > While the first email was already quite full of tension and off-hand remarks about my code being offensive and undemonstrated claims about code being bad in general, the second one was worse in that respect, There was a lot of different issues discussed in those emails. You ignoring most of them and retelling the contents now in this simplistic way is offensive (but about on par with your other messages in this discussion). I'm not going to describe the same things again and again, in many different ways. I have wasted enough time on this already. And if you didn't want reviews this long, you shouldn't have submitted a branch with multiple orthogonal features intermixed. You should have picked a proper solution to the issue #1, then filed a bug for the next one. Then we could have had much easier, targeted reviews.