From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Ulrich Windl" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; =?UTF-8?Q?C=E2=80=91x?= = for Unicode Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 14:24:06 +0100 Message-ID: <61F29CF6020000A100047343@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de> References: <87a6fl5w11.fsf@gnus.org> <14F24EE3-901E-4622-8210-6C4F2134E9BA@acm.org> <87czkh1jqo.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmoh3xdk.fsf@gnus.org> <877dap3uea.fsf@gnus.org> <4CEFB383-E7C8-4AA8-9B43-6267E5523DC3@acm.org> <87lez2tzfz.fsf@gnus.org> <87a6fihaku.fsf@gmail.com> <537072BC-F9DF-4B7B-BA88-02320A731013@acm.org> <469D64F5020000015C413831@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de> <0106AEA10200006A824A10E1@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de> <13FDBD490200009C5C413831@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de> <61F261F5020000A10004730B@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de> <87y231fr9l.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5705"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 24902@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org To: ,"Robert Pluim" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 27 14:32:04 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nD4sb-0001AJ-Sj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 14:32:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55388 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nD4sY-0004dg-IC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:31:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40830) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nD4lq-0002N6-GS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:25:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33434) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nD4lq-0003Ba-76 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:25:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nD4lq-0002UW-0g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:25:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Ulrich Windl" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 13:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24902 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 24902-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24902.16432898549507 (code B ref 24902); Thu, 27 Jan 2022 13:25:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24902) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2022 13:24:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54570 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nD4l3-0002TH-U3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:24:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.uni-regensburg.de ([194.94.157.146]:57894) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nD4l1-0002T5-AZ for 24902@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:24:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.uni-regensburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 503A8600005B for <24902@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 14:24:08 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de (gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de [132.199.5.51]) by mx1.uni-regensburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340456000059 for <24902@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 14:24:08 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from uni-regensburg-smtp1-MTA by gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 14:24:09 +0100 X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 18.3.1 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:225346 Archived-At: >>> Mattias Engdegård schrieb am 27.01.2022 um 13:38 in Nachricht : > 27 jan. 2022 kl. 10.43 skrev Robert Pluim : > >> Those are codepoints which have both a 'name' and an 'old-name'. >> 'C-u C-x =' will show both by default, I donʼt think itʼs necessary >> for 'C-x =', which will show 'name' if it exists, else 'old-name'. > > Right, and it is probably the right call here -- only control characters > have an old-name but no name (some have neither). > There is a single name/old-name collision, U+1F514 vs U+0007, but there's no > serious risk of confusion. According to BabelPad the names are different: U+0007 : ALERT [BEL] U+1F514 BELL > >> Iʼm more interested in the visual separation between the U+ABCD and >> the name. U+ABCD MEETEI MAYEK LETTER HUK : ha ;-) > > Just a space seems to be the standard convention to the point that > characters are nowadays often identified in that manner in prose, as in > U+00A7 SECTION SIGN. > It also reinforces the connection between the code and the name, being > separate from the rest of the information being displayed, which is about the > cursor position. Is it good enough, you think?