From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs
Subject: Re: Emacs Website. Was: 21.2 release. Was: dabbrev can hang in
 presence of fields
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:23:56 +0200
Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <6137-Fri22Mar2002162356+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020318185849.10731D-100000@is> <yebbsdl9ccy.fsf@xpc21.ast.cam.ac.uk>
 <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020319133309.17982F-100000@is>
 <yeb663sagok.fsf@xpc21.ast.cam.ac.uk>
 <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020319164023.19703B@is> <87pu1zcx8y.fsf_-_@gnu.org>
 <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020321085114.5863N-100000@is> <87d6xwkj9e.fsf@gnu.org>
 <5567-Fri22Mar2002135300+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <874rj8spv3.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016807431 15465 127.0.0.1 (22 Mar 2002 14:30:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 14:30:31 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: gnu-emacs-bug@gnu.org
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 16oQ3q-00041K-00
	for <gnu-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org>; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 15:30:30 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16oQ3p-0006Am-00; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 09:30:29 -0500
Original-Received: from balder.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.15])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16oQ0k-0005o9-00; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 09:27:18 -0500
Original-Received: from zaretsky (diup-218-188.inter.net.il [213.8.218.188])
	by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint)
	with ESMTP id BGQ50931;
	Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:27:15 +0200 (IST)
Original-To: alex@gnu.org
X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-Reply-To: <874rj8spv3.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Alex Schroeder on Fri, 22
	Mar 2002 14:18:08 +0100)
Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
	the Swiss army knife of text editors <bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/bug-gnu-emacs/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:82
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:82

> Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug
> From: Alex Schroeder <alex@gnu.org>
> Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 14:18:08 +0100
> 
> "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il> writes:
> 
> >> I would, if I thought it would stand a chance.  I just assume that
> >> either the GNU people running the server don't want to install weird
> >> software (such as the wiki script), or people are affraid of abuse.
> >> But other than that, yes, I think it is a good solution.
> >
> > Well, in that case, I disagree.
> 
> With the arguments mentioned, or because of something else?  Or with
> the assumption I made?

With the suggestion that it would be a good solution for the Emacs
Web page.

> What I WANTED to say is that even though the pages are publically
> editable, there is not much abuse.

I'm not worried about abuse, I'm worried about quality: the clarity
of the text, even spelling.

_______________________________________________
Bug-gnu-emacs mailing list
Bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs