From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mauro Aranda Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46917: 28.0.50; error when unloading feature after loading elp Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 17:30:09 -0300 Message-ID: <60414354.1c69fb81.a2784.235d@mx.google.com> References: <6040d799.1c69fb81.936e9.ec05@mx.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16197"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 46917@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 04 21:31:57 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lHudZ-00048l-Pd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 21:31:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45374 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHudY-0006Yt-PW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 15:31:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59926) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHucg-0005iq-FC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 15:31:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48838) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHucg-0003GL-8I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 15:31:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lHucg-0003q3-4O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 15:31:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mauro Aranda Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 20:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46917 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 46917-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46917.161488982512556 (code B ref 46917); Thu, 04 Mar 2021 20:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46917) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Mar 2021 20:30:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60381 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lHuc5-0003G7-CK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 15:30:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qk1-f170.google.com ([209.85.222.170]:36388) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lHubz-00033C-Lg for 46917@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 15:30:23 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qk1-f170.google.com with SMTP id n79so17673410qke.3 for <46917@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 12:30:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:mime-version; bh=g9BNiKCi11+g0Yj+Kse1dyatbcyEZwkHwEO5UG3EUes=; b=goolGcfB0IxBOUaq3IpUeonl9YQJRGFUXQjvnqw4M/ACBco3ZqZ/mGbwT72g0sUysn zVKcLoATrpxTKnEfa1sOPCaOWgi3eOssIklx6lSaiilyWxMZo0m+O7e1B/x4IlCD88eX /9ZU8Pof8i9RDqSRrLpTMN9IaHar9qPAbnjNYEmc7xKzhec+5JrByC27ceoCLku9QqqT j47NS5AqYbRvPQlrHYbB6jFCOpuEQ5gSXIaKVEDtlwWZW3Xb3gYqud6myYcvZ7UxUOjq 0YO6jjXsKPc1uCvI0BlFMhc+u2DowDB+BxJiT4sRQYspuII/cMAqSC+IOq0q1oirUZ+b wYkg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :mime-version; bh=g9BNiKCi11+g0Yj+Kse1dyatbcyEZwkHwEO5UG3EUes=; b=A8DJ+3ihb6SWG4d7ztzuEotxCN7TVV6QBk3zNNSNAuk/7LdMH/REqY73LFjMtzU5JP x9BSD3nwGL5jSezXdCyOLPCKZWLv7pDpMENfseQgfOHRHtXcT+uf+okEt2ak5E5pB3G+ IXlJgmjIaLqziU5Tji0blX5E8aYF6DLxGJaYngYYxVx21+dGjZr2iwSR8t4KuQyWoEVV z7T423lwnsNIRLGJS8d52NjaubMiQeCjIk0A3idUwheVxv1xkN9rbeWQSR51a/SjCom2 3y2InWcn5kxRC7k4cNU1vn+FI1F6O5sj3TnJD7RsDerz0kz1NiSs6SeQv09DOkqajRlL dKiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533keou1UPipLeUBdvacxwAociOo9EChMWFNRCwfa5wXPvuHWTmN NikYgJLZ0lF7gG8XAF8JWgxZzqvDlWUHcMlw X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzB0A0A3SriSMvkZycLn/RsHjcPPYNA1JAhdOWUeabTfN4fyNa8yh2MvynWAoil5whPMTD35Q== X-Received: by 2002:ae9:e912:: with SMTP id x18mr6027674qkf.475.1614889812885; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 12:30:12 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from tbb-desktop ([201.213.132.172]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a67sm277591qkb.61.2021.03.04.12.30.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 04 Mar 2021 12:30:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-Message-ID: <87h7lqr7am.fsf@maurooaranda@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87tupqu10v.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 04 Mar 2021 21:17:20 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:201461 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Mauro Aranda writes: > >>> Starting from emacs -Q, do: >>> >>> 1. In the *scratch* buffer, type and evaluate (in any order): >>> (require 'autoarg) ; Whatever feature. >>> (require 'elp) >>> >>> 2. Type and evaluate >>> (unload-feature 'autoarg) >>> >>> 3. Emacs signals an error: >>> "Unsupported qualifiers in function loadhist-unload-element: >>> (:before :extra \"elp\")" >>> >> >> Looks like the problem is the order of the qualifiers; the attached >> patch should fix it. > > [...] > >> * lisp/emacs-lisp/elp.el (loadhist-unload-element): The :extra >> qualifier is expected to come before the other qualifiers, so do >> that. (Bug#46917) > > I had a quick look at the documentation -- this limitation doesn't seem > to be stated anywhere? It's hard to take a long look, since the documentation about :extra is scarce ;-) > Perhaps it should be, or perhaps the restriction should be lifted? I don't really have an opinion. My guess is that expecting :extra to come first just makes the code simpler.