From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8775: 24.0.50; crash, GDB info Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:27:21 -0400 Message-ID: <5yzkm2qiqe.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <83mxi2fva9.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1306902505 5916 80.91.229.12 (1 Jun 2011 04:28:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 04:28:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8775@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 01 06:28:19 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QRd2X-0006XL-W9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 06:28:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51076 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRd2X-0000rV-21 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:28:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37709) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRd2I-0000rF-RV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:28:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRd2I-00013l-8c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35815) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRd2I-00013g-3t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QRd2H-00057O-Vd; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:28:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 04:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8775 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8775-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8775.130690245019631 (code B ref 8775); Wed, 01 Jun 2011 04:28:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8775) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jun 2011 04:27:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QRd1m-00056a-Fl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:27:30 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QRd1l-00056P-36 for 8775@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:27:29 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56682) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRd1e-0004xN-Br; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:27:22 -0400 X-Spook: Sears Tower Europol ASO Ansar al-Islam Arnett COSCO X-Ran: :IcuvtW.+B42ZdrnW0>Ee2VWTMG5TH%UOvj%VmUm@rzi#wJb3guN"Yb`bj[/hdU-#f`FS: X-Hue: yellow X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <83mxi2fva9.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 31 May 2011 23:51:42 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:28:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:46858 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > According to this, you were exiting Emacs when it crashed. Is that > correct? If so, it looks like a duplicate of bug #6278. Also similar to #3255.