From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7791: 24.0.50; vc-annotate doesn't work on large SVN files Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:35:21 -0500 Message-ID: <5vaaj18tjq.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <87r5cr6vf4.fsf@everybody.org> <87zkrcd0uo.fsf@everybody.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1295146481 17741 80.91.229.12 (16 Jan 2011 02:54:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 02:54:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7791@debbugs.gnu.org To: mah@everybody.org (Mark A. Hershberger) Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 16 03:54:34 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PeIlF-0000BB-Mm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 03:54:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41117 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PeIlF-0005MD-07 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:54:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47709 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PeIlA-0005M8-LP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:54:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PeIl9-0003BI-G3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:54:28 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37270) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PeIl9-0003BE-8x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:54:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PeILZ-0002wK-PJ; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:28:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87r5cr6vf4.fsf@everybody.org> Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 02:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7791 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7791-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7791.129514486911281 (code B ref 7791); Sun, 16 Jan 2011 02:28:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7791) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2011 02:27:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PeILM-0002vu-Sn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:27:49 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PeILK-0002vj-Lo for 7791@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:27:47 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45998) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PeISg-0003CE-6k; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:35:22 -0500 X-Spook: quarter covert video sniper CIA SCUD missile spy Bosnia X-Ran: yl,0h-b4z'1^\pj&I7PH2rbEj,_v@+_o$_Nm]Uh~GOuC0A]x97`Gf_v%jDzu5yITLIoKl( X-Hue: black X-Attribution: GM User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:28:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:43391 Archived-At: Hello? If that worked for you I can add it to PROBLEMS. Perhaps someone who understands the libc/ssh/cvs issue could comment on whether this is likely to be similar?