From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#65344: 28.2; Unable to Edebug cl-flet form which uses argument destructuring Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2023 07:15:55 +0200 Message-ID: <5e5ac9ac-5332-4576-d427-2d43b40bfb1e@gmail.com> References: <040fe8aa-7a15-762c-e710-eb85f997d329@gmail.com> <871qg1tghr.fsf@web.de> <012813c5-cfc3-7ba9-5e84-70d79c172e77@gmail.com> <87zg2oyjre.fsf@web.de> <8b7fc1c2-ae6c-b825-c772-38b18ddb67d6@gmail.com> <871qfys4xi.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33379"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.14.0 Cc: brandon.irizarry@gmail.com, Eli Zaretskii , 65344@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 20 07:17:21 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qXaoS-0008WN-Ov for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 07:17:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qXaoA-000883-VW; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 01:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qXao9-00087t-AN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 01:17:01 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qXao9-0000fy-0P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 01:17:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qXaoA-0006ut-4v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 01:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2023 05:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65344 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 65344-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65344.169250856726518 (code B ref 65344); Sun, 20 Aug 2023 05:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 65344) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Aug 2023 05:16:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52681 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qXanH-0006te-HH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 01:16:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-x62b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::62b]:46378) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qXanE-0006sx-23 for 65344@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 01:16:06 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-99bdcade7fbso277230466b.1 for <65344@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 19 Aug 2023 22:16:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1692508556; x=1693113356; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xgPglmf7wG4/eDuT7CYuh6WO8Al9+WEm1AKzxUfHabM=; b=ZmUvk/nD7NwH5Oet520QXS8Feq3aozmXdNcDxCWQM9nsHc90ePLjSET8kDtnOG6rMW ICZgNJ35bnEhTaAcu1mh/c3TKxyY3abyVOye00oe7jFWWMJWTg6dhu9mMJ2SkQDAjx2t eTNRbG4D0AWYUElaoF/Um0YSC+7Li5a9O7nSyPVi/gZEfni13RlXF003Re5uM7RByGfr iZRbq9OAny4FNxGYep18aIMZlTF7PcO/bqOJjzCarqNoDfbqM3cP/qcYJq4BrVKdufNY YIWdcmTEzKCuqlAptxTZk4Ef7kgqUeFOfaVEBfgeGh1KlPBb/zJ/P/scpT7WQ+6IAAyK 1jBg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1692508556; x=1693113356; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xgPglmf7wG4/eDuT7CYuh6WO8Al9+WEm1AKzxUfHabM=; b=j+8WqAmMxy4bGldV/ImN4gBnLTTQLI9LiLmY/jYH7Onv8JTKdhHzlixL37K2FQzhe2 hn8Hych9mBIdkV9k77/DhO3dANkoRZ7NC1JxGFw4P29KLF3aVolhqMYaRsKstMFP90Mi xufPdLaXQkvKtljrHxVBbutag3HUKfvwlDYF6k3p/oFGiHU7uhCzAb2IUA/npWsve8dR luLNCk3O87S2fbfk/K8Uhhb99uorKxTQTfCgs+veT3Ygb6TMvWQ0s/QbnHP3L+wyMWPB uMbQY3egN8gSs9kEjJr/GwvpGtMgxd2dnPnJRMztZM+Wke1yTkJFNnLt5FEyP0zKjK2h PM1g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyJoxYJYPDpzgn9xfqvrLDhhihPktlDhXV+64ja/hAm6SBzCdDD MThECeVoesQgsJdX57BnNz8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEOupcg5p1XS9Dx6/+7t40aBzw33mANXEO7ik/sXxfC+VGYLCYj0WVMuMZ9PNQkJj+73bq4fg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:217:b0:993:fe68:569d with SMTP id 23-20020a170906021700b00993fe68569dmr2989803ejd.17.1692508556323; Sat, 19 Aug 2023 22:15:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.178.21] (p54b0cabb.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [84.176.202.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s16-20020a1709067b9000b009932337747esm3934811ejo.86.2023.08.19.22.15.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 19 Aug 2023 22:15:55 -0700 (PDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <871qfys4xi.fsf@web.de> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:267936 Archived-At: On 20.08.23 06:39, Michael Heerdegen wrote: > Gerd Möllmann writes: > >> (The description in the Elisp manual, BTW, also explain what the >> duplicate name does, although I'm not sure why it is done here, >> because the names of the local functions should be unique already. >> I'm probably overlooking something.) > > Ok - I understand now that the names are used by Edebug internally, to > map the code pieces to a descriptor. > > Then I guess the names must be unique here because shadowing local > functions would get the same name assigned. Or any that appear > anywhere, actually... right? Correct.