From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sebastian Urban Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48654: Overfull hbox, Unicode code points style (display.texi) Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 09:37:37 +0200 Message-ID: <5db3ff2d-1c26-35cb-084a-0ef3d48928a6@gmail.com> References: <1b291257-516b-e751-1a7b-79823964ad16@gmail.com> <83lf82bufx.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5185"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 Cc: 48654@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 26 09:38:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1llo7G-0001C1-9I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 09:38:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50432 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llo7F-0001sr-CO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 03:38:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36070) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llo78-0001sT-JX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 03:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35994) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llo78-0003iK-Bw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 03:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1llo78-00013F-9v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 03:38:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Sebastian Urban Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 07:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48654 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 48654-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48654.16220146694022 (code B ref 48654); Wed, 26 May 2021 07:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48654) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 May 2021 07:37:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47540 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1llo6u-00012o-Lj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 03:37:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-f53.google.com ([209.85.208.53]:42961) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1llo6s-00012a-5v for 48654@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 03:37:47 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-f53.google.com with SMTP id i13so114729edb.9 for <48654@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 26 May 2021 00:37:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uRI/LSJFj+cBXZ7y4xJzGz9/OhlBwQvnIi7J/dm2Dkk=; b=VQGovXOAFPaGXqHuItC80E6CHxDlghV+Z7Mi4LGFqbPMNuI5I4FFzXqYEggKSbnNgY QoBrf7nWqmK73u/2OKq4tciV33+yHRFkvrCNeLML/7SiLsw4bYtc3mgGgEbbX8kh7kMg ZUltOwfuRr8mL+3h2UZG4zM/H7RnuIr79SOpWEg6OTfuz7WsapktnRFXvj1Eh6jowaw1 ssqCk2Bgj1lA3+R3s4qPQQmzt/MKGbK5juoA7YyPUXugmnpHWyn0yA+n5lm4r4i84sk5 8jJ3ia2y2/U9EoAelew2EYjizAgSzqIVU9f7S6jdrYA14tKwlLPAcHwnxwguNvFFL9XN oRZw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uRI/LSJFj+cBXZ7y4xJzGz9/OhlBwQvnIi7J/dm2Dkk=; b=ZhqU8ChU3tGhxLNL3t/K+c8Ncy/9wFCiveubqbJPOuoX7g5Ts/zHq0BNGg2KHrlDlB O7qVFslHXHyMf9fSC9Ugo5M6VelhLC8eXs9So+GvGzBD19prrNNmLuORNwPzeZOc7Q7T sEaeglpHr8/JEbxg1BvKyC2fz7v/KxPHTlPrFvEjQAfOnCpSaH5KqZ9zTiU+DJKGiw0O UTWyYbykjqcLaSchoyW7Up9L+D13H9caXS1jMMAHol51e1V1ohohEmbcozbxuVpBpq+y RbCNLRR1+UI2nWlBhVtcGkC4Oa2A6U4hpBgAiRpKqSLNYF17G4paJa8OSQlWND5yRKL5 zHaQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5306nicKKNYR5Gj1+OXC1bWDwxeNIoX6XGHCB4KrPFIhMR4HCWLF gNFDdc0SyT6loHgJoxgyB6IJWw5u5vc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyiAg/gZMQW+IhqYTBa83FF9SooctuN7cp7zdPT6WdCqdqPGGuqF8K0ogasyghvexyU9VdbGg== X-Received: by 2002:a50:c352:: with SMTP id q18mr37094861edb.30.1622014660363; Wed, 26 May 2021 00:37:40 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?IPv6:2a00:f41:c9a:ed08:c060:5b36:fec1:c5c6? ([2a00:f41:c9a:ed08:c060:5b36:fec1:c5c6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j7sm1908580edr.79.2021.05.26.00.37.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 26 May 2021 00:37:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83lf82bufx.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-GB X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:207273 Archived-At: >> As for Unicode code points it was decided to use "U+NNNN @sc{char >> name}", so I adjusted all of them. > > Please use the exact names of the characters as they appear in the > UnicodeData.txt file. Hmmm... which one is incorrect? > Also, why remove @code{..} from the "U+NNNN" notation -- what does > that solve? Because, ~2 years ago you decided to follow Unicode docs notation, and I'm just fixing the leftovers. See your commit: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=f68b33f50299339a36da29cd1913d19fd5f288e0 >> Finally, in a different file - FIXIT.TEXI - there is line 356, >> where the word "dictionary" uses a discretionary hyphens - are they >> used somewhere? Because, in the PDF there is no line breaking for >> this sentence and if it's correct, perhaps adding this word to >> DOCSTYLE.TEXI would be a better option. > > It depends on surrounding text: if the word gets close to a line > break, we want it to break correctly. I don't know if it's a good idea to keep this just in case someone changes the text in the future, or makes PDF using A5 page format. Currently (official PDF), it's not close to a line break. But if it stays, I suggest moving it to DOCSTYLE.TEXI, where other problematic words are gathered below this line: @c It turns out TeX sometimes fails to hyphenate, so we help it here @hyphenation{...}