From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47012: xref copies keymap properties to minibuffer Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 03:25:10 +0300 Message-ID: <5d95f2a8-4d46-d926-51e2-d5c521bc9060@yandex.ru> References: <87czw9tnu9.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <3aad442a-7319-5db5-2fc6-560bb032c34d@yandex.ru> <87a6r9v24b.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87sg4kb839.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <871rc3bls6.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <871rc2ly7x.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <4228b128-039c-2bcd-002c-5ac830d7a4d3@yandex.ru> <87pmzgtr80.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <186b46fa-3716-a76d-db85-09638d7805c7@yandex.ru> <8335wbiaaj.fsf@gnu.org> <831rbvi7l6.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27118"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 Cc: 47012@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 01 02:26:15 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lRlA6-0006vs-7p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 02:26:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55884 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRlA4-0002V6-LX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 20:26:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35872) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRl9u-0002Tg-Hd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 20:26:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44233) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRl9u-0007Dl-3Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 20:26:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRl9t-0004uC-Vm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 20:26:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 00:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47012 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47012-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47012.161723672018800 (code B ref 47012); Thu, 01 Apr 2021 00:26:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47012) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2021 00:25:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55777 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRl9E-0004tA-6x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 20:25:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-f51.google.com ([209.85.218.51]:44662) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRl9C-0004st-PL for 47012@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 20:25:19 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-f51.google.com with SMTP id e14so242087ejz.11 for <47012@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 17:25:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rC6DASNJV1t+pA/oJ2nNIY6BKc+rWDknkyFoMx9OeB8=; b=WoAAQWLF/n0Ji1FVZcDOeMa7MzxnLpFmpvk9ld7hAAQSnvDmDYEDG8R2c6iAdBqsZl MS5zHYHxI3STv7+QKtxIaclu26/edBWGbmA5LVN6Ovpuu74AMjFilFQSSJiousn+hRCk gn+3F4jPaa/mVCOxWQcXqe60eVVid83H2kKU6xRjLQ9OOO7sW3Y7jBcb4p8KMFSe8Tba DPyp/Ed+Ybb4BMaHnEajZBqmo8hC6LaR1DahxV5Vl3NEDXTimT3u0Z4yllh6E4hloZvx eQnawqyxraLttsgP4FeXxdOaoF6hwmBKmS5vM9kbPEzGlYpmxfQ7ddIbLz7gbUNsyBbo oGWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rC6DASNJV1t+pA/oJ2nNIY6BKc+rWDknkyFoMx9OeB8=; b=qWS0NqP0hop2Ei7GSjaUI5qRUP3tG8HtCWQUhj3FuJYYKidV6MGIalDmPdixQyfQsF ziOWV4ESjIMuTbnIw6jmW0T9jzVKDpjVfKywdfyXZf8OBoTPHpMVMCDMtgQOzHcsFWYN Um8qxRPPJfZQdVY4206PKy3wsSia+E/K2hhLLWsLmu6N1xWXfcPtO38P/LwpwtvFspS+ TAz7+PntP8Rn/uO5E8cF4AndqLnyun5a+lUZsrIb8DDXsONG8gc9KZRExZf5Az0VkRaS 65mYEkZXwUJUDktSG5Kdl8gHvtbdxxiI3IaPKpdcjT3m8VOtp4Eme/cKuSemuWuryCaK I9sg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532cGeeIgb6DZ0lvCJB52kydG36BhJlzS0NMt0MelwWTNQDWBKmg 4vt1gljGQ+nZM6Z/SoQJZyg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxZe3P2qgz9VpTqPHo/OVMUmDixisfFrqcqOe7m0L6O+9UP7p33KgbUTpYj14josbfTcRUE7w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5689:: with SMTP id am9mr6264616ejc.298.1617236712862; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 17:25:12 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id d5sm2003343ejc.98.2021.03.31.17.25.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 17:25:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <831rbvi7l6.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:203399 Archived-At: On 31.03.2021 19:57, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I'm just worried by the amount of attention this one face suddenly > needs. You responded after we exchanged only two messages on the subject. This qualifies as "attention", but just barely. > Why is that? No other face I have ever met needed such > elaborate research regarding its defaults. Is that good or bad? Not too long ago, we've discussed (and changed!) the defaults of diff-mode faces, with very positive results. Not sure we'll be able to reach the same level of agreement on this issue, but it shouldn't hurt to try. help-key-binding is another face which was discussed recently, again, with excellent result.