From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14064: info.info page has conflict with info package Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:29:49 -0400 Message-ID: <5cbo9yciyq.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <5152E426.1000800@redhat.com> <51530C74.2060000@redhat.com> <2j7gkn79nb.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83wqsn2y5n.fsf@gnu.org> <83sj3a3j9u.fsf@gnu.org> <83a9pijjz2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364833815 23820 80.91.229.3 (1 Apr 2013 16:30:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 16:30:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14064@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 01 18:30:41 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UMhd2-0006te-1s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 18:30:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45346 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UMhcd-0007E7-6n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:30:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38942) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UMhcZ-0007DF-5T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:30:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UMhcX-0004be-5n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:30:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52116) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UMhcX-0004bZ-2w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:30:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UMhfJ-0000k7-QV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:33:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 16:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14064 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14064-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14064.13648339692829 (code B ref 14064); Mon, 01 Apr 2013 16:33:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14064) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2013 16:32:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56225 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UMhf6-0000jZ-L6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:32:49 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:33458) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UMhf3-0000jO-Ao for 14064@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:32:46 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UMhcD-0008Nq-Ss; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:29:49 -0400 X-Spook: Project Monarch Bosnia Semtex fraud Leuken-Baden 2600 X-Ran: JA~EU.l51P$sNO%.GajZ-*j[dqG:@!>r]-\hOc25M`nicTwg|~[C[EGdag@`<'\kc4SK]| X-Hue: black X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <83a9pijjz2.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 01 Apr 2013 19:26:09 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:73074 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > That's true, but why do we bother about Emacs being installed from an > rpm? Because that's the only situation in which there is a real issue (AFAICS), and is the original source of this report. > That's _really_ the job of whoever prepares the rpm. I agree, but they have reported it here. > I thought we are talking about "make install", where we do control > things. Does it make sense to refrain from overwriting at that time? Not AFAICS. Why bother? Why is it any different to overwriting eg emacs.info? It will just lead to a stale info.info hanging around forever (not that it changes much).