unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Phil Sainty <psainty@orcon.net.nz>
To: Noam Postavsky <npostavs@gmail.com>
Cc: Gemini Lasswell <gazally@runbox.com>,
	bug-gnu-emacs
	<bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+psainty=orcon.net.nz@gnu.org>,
	31688@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#31688: 26.1.50; Byte compiler confuses two string variables
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2018 11:38:44 +1200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c6b2383ccd9c7d9b4058d249274b8c4@webmail.orcon.net.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87po199id0.fsf@gmail.com>

On 2018-06-03 06:02, Noam Postavsky wrote:
> I don't think this is a bug, the compiler coalesces equal string
> literals.

Ouch.  Has this always been the case?  I've been firmly under the
impression that the lisp reader creates a new lisp objects whenever
it reads a string, so it's hugely surprising to me to learn that
(eq str1 str2) can return different results depending on whether
or not the code was byte-compiled.

I see that this is t when compiled and nil otherwise:

(let ((str1 "abc")
       (str2 "abc"))
   (eq str1 str2)))

But this is nil regardless:

(eq "abc" "abc")

This seems kinda horrible?

-Phil






  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-06-02 23:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-02 17:51 bug#31688: 26.1.50; Byte compiler confuses two string variables Gemini Lasswell
2018-06-02 18:02 ` Noam Postavsky
2018-06-02 22:52   ` Gemini Lasswell
2018-06-02 23:25     ` Noam Postavsky
2018-06-03  0:40     ` Drew Adams
2018-06-02 23:03   ` Drew Adams
2018-06-02 23:38   ` Phil Sainty [this message]
2018-06-02 23:54     ` Noam Postavsky
2018-06-03 12:32       ` Phil Sainty
2018-06-03 13:05         ` Andreas Schwab
2018-06-04 10:02           ` Phil Sainty
2018-06-04 15:58             ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-06-04 17:01             ` Andreas Schwab
2018-06-08 15:09               ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-06-03  0:02     ` Michael Heerdegen
2018-06-03  0:46       ` Drew Adams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5c6b2383ccd9c7d9b4058d249274b8c4@webmail.orcon.net.nz \
    --to=psainty@orcon.net.nz \
    --cc=31688@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+psainty=orcon.net.nz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gazally@runbox.com \
    --cc=npostavs@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).