From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#58447: [PATCH] In project-find-file, add absolute file name to history Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 19:10:38 +0300 Message-ID: <5c1cc828-5fcd-667f-41d4-f19923b2958e@yandex.ru> References: <8735budxiz.fsf@gmail.com> <83a662dvgo.fsf@gnu.org> <871qqvj6qb.fsf@gmail.com> <42bb91a0-60ff-2e51-dcdc-c1e1f80e31ec@yandex.ru> <837d0lmmpi.fsf@gnu.org> <1cce089a-546e-7f13-0907-3d36452aef10@yandex.ru> <83v8o5l0wa.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26072"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2 Cc: arstoffel@gmail.com, 58447@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 27 18:12:16 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oo5UN-0006eD-UA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 18:12:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oo5Ty-0002A1-9b; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 12:11:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oo5TQ-0000VX-TV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 12:11:19 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oo5TC-0005Hh-M7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 12:11:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oo5TC-0007fg-Gf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 12:11:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 16:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 58447 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 58447-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B58447.166688705429470 (code B ref 58447); Thu, 27 Oct 2022 16:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 58447) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Oct 2022 16:10:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59064 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oo5T3-0007fG-W6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 12:10:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f50.google.com ([209.85.221.50]:40514) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oo5Sv-0007ev-Lb for 58447@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 12:10:46 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f50.google.com with SMTP id z14so3069813wrn.7 for <58447@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 09:10:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=X92NMtkMj0bCPEjqjJ/RAnlATNYOtP5/g02zUUEt4+8=; b=ha8vSaz2x95HKoYCLtYJOmKbL4pYl0HDtocjQ6X0udDMM/w40P/IpVOjiuQlMWFikF uzl1C6+TM/6fGAVkRQUgDvXzFzTGLIh+vrf9Imk2gzZN/AXnny0b5iIDQ46O+fkZEvy8 sQmzvB+02fnfNukwwJQZUmTOAV9Ymv/7pCJaNYvnr3sZr2eCzrOylQd+qQGW17aO0lpV hMLmYEid/8uEBx2QSCurCTtJn7A3aR4DVVrkn88luqVprTMWRL4fHp1VrRLrKsaLFa7K ochEZ3XXjLlS3AKRNuTY8twrydRM6YDAqqOPDG11wpHjFqURSV72FOvYI2yUQuXZvWd5 YdvA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=X92NMtkMj0bCPEjqjJ/RAnlATNYOtP5/g02zUUEt4+8=; b=Q5kzcNmXxnPz/ngd1CCPhzUE9Umu3h9cDxqawv0FPpIpgvSwoCCh9LBHmKZJNHXjFF oBYDZYIskwwCEM2BmhzJM8S+w1XdCAG0n4mX6iCupF+mc280LKNSlNfKz2UD9YAmVwPB WkH8y+6mtte3j/TyqqaQPOAmdw7/7HpPfV/FUz4+vcisO6IvGwLJ6q7QN4nKS3CuMyhU oMQ9fhY8uKHpg/w7dngpbZcJ9r2xWTBBDRXtSnJO1m9eVFKKZukJXQL6FMsO69YqTtE3 8dZyulxDH3+CbdtAgm9YhfblXSqXbLRFNO9KATujNmX8kOPnyUkDHtwi96JORejsM047 9ncA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0YZeifilVrtcWabGOhecIhEE9ZP1on2xESs2lYUA21j3zAjUF5 t4Y8fXqPfDzmr+54eVVjgZI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7GlNSZAyWK2lZe4IRr28xOdBzU7Okm1HhESRe26oZfkUCsGnrgn2uCD+fVv8hRaTERAaMqqQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:d1c9:0:b0:225:f98:d602 with SMTP id b9-20020adfd1c9000000b002250f98d602mr33022627wrd.419.1666887040097; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 09:10:40 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f22-20020a5d58f6000000b0022afcc11f65sm1537752wrd.47.2022.10.27.09.10.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Oct 2022 09:10:39 -0700 (PDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <83v8o5l0wa.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:246318 Archived-At: On 27.10.2022 18:52, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 17:21:24 +0300 >> Cc:arstoffel@gmail.com,58447@debbugs.gnu.org >> From: Dmitry Gutov >> >>>> I like both of these ideas, except I'm not sure how to implement the >>>> project-specific part better. >>>> >>>> I suppose we won't be passing the history var to completing-read anymore? >>> I thought about a project-specific history variable. >> ...one global variable per project? > Yes, I think so. Are there any downsides that I overlooked? The idea of having a multitude of similar variables gave me a pause. But it's not a deal-breaker, I suppose. Also a couple of questions we're talking about in the other branch.