From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20846: 24.4; Electric-indent-mode does not call indent-line-function after hitting RET inside a comment Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 16:35:51 +0300 Message-ID: <5b9559aa-f6be-f3a6-72db-05e72f7f3bdf@yandex.ru> References: <871r9t6pgd.fsf@gnus.org> <838s40acf9.fsf@gnu.org> <87sg273fqo.fsf@gnus.org> <83fsy78l2p.fsf@gnu.org> <49c82e08-f15e-e564-1740-86271fc94f3b@yandex.ru> <8335u780u6.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35964"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 Cc: robin.neatherway@gmail.com, larsi@gnus.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 20846@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 28 15:37:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lmcfm-00098i-Iz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 15:37:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58842 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lmcfk-0004KO-Rb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 09:37:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56986) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lmcfd-0004K0-W0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 09:37:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42355) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lmcfd-0005Lp-OO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 09:37:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lmcfd-0002S9-LE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 09:37:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 13:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20846 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 20846-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20846.16222089629350 (code B ref 20846); Fri, 28 May 2021 13:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20846) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 May 2021 13:36:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53901 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lmcef-0002Qj-Tp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 09:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f52.google.com ([209.85.221.52]:45829) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lmced-0002QF-Jh for 20846@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 09:36:00 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f52.google.com with SMTP id x7so3294626wrt.12 for <20846@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 28 May 2021 06:35:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=L9YW4wR2sqfXk4mxSt6VbS4mpiMjLAJ8LvST36NFO1M=; b=mqXUiIJtv/hS/xv8RZqe1q8q9VTIFI92EOwVlgrDnLdJBfukLoALznFimBpb0NANNB anvP+EwvA48VsP+/MSr2rWnLzriv5AXURitMR/DWV2Erca/IZknsbHQKE+6RpHnnxOAQ q2QPiAnYssuITbDghX+XSfo8SGiK/zudghWD1kIB1YVl/SYZoizwJYEsFLkHVFa73R2l lKTSN+Uco1CgoD4YZkv6PRU2apiD/lSwBgAPDakO1W1C5Tzr0FhiWPHLmQaq/QevQNJS zovu05xGLLulzULnb7nAoIS0ye2rxrIXLmzE8um68aMtL5IwlUnEdYlL28YEjWjXsvWd rEkw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=L9YW4wR2sqfXk4mxSt6VbS4mpiMjLAJ8LvST36NFO1M=; b=SRqs30rkQmRI1lujp5QcG1wAo4JNC/qZL9Ht6T0xgWC54c9PeE+jmH8vpRwvnhQwRZ 3O8eyyNNgaA8lHN72p67+m9/rRWXykaWO5wdaGzTfX5W9Z5nUcGg6EN1RwE8CDPE4ZaO mV95mKq4sdbiCQ5hcbdBOZAagj3ENrfKxUaWIXpKhYn2toxJBxnrqvB3lNyyBUh35PZf JwMXjUif4tlVPU77oCdzrOSqrmRTisnhkXPX9D0FKgbohwTI1V6gxqmWq4A7EktOnHyn HYLco2y7Ivzdh8oszM9UbR56Uhmt/KWNsLfz00gNmlVLGNKUl7MGhDsNon/gaHWVzsGU kBQw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Hyr+6cOtdRVSeaHp9lej7srwVW1viI7M1nCBeOfqTFvyPyqWr Dcn3V8UufrM7ajNZyrhQR46gbw4famc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxRKZmMdApwbxJ9jkciWedctfeYels6hUsIEtOcU17wgFrs6hNMfXtgId2+a19LpQm9GjyU7Q== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4e48:: with SMTP id r8mr8751394wrt.187.1622208953713; Fri, 28 May 2021 06:35:53 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id m10sm7278792wrr.2.2021.05.28.06.35.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 28 May 2021 06:35:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8335u780u6.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:207458 Archived-At: On 28.05.2021 16:06, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Then that sentence is misleading and should be rephrased, Maybe? I don't have a better wording to suggest off the top of my head. > because my > reading of it is that it clearly states that auto-indentation inside > strings is generally impossible, and expects the implementations to > behave like that. Consider this from a design POV: if all indentation functions were supposed to return 'noindent when inside a string or comment, indent-for-tab-command could do that check itself and avoid calling indent-line-function entirely in that case. And also that #'indent-relative (the default value of indent-line-function) does indent inside strings and comments.