From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6491: 24.0.50; list-buffers should not throw away marks Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:58:47 -0700 Message-ID: <5C89778B3B7B41ED879CE82090933E46@us.oracle.com> References: <87d3vjqtta.fsf@jidanni.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310601569 28945 80.91.229.12 (13 Jul 2011 23:59:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6491@debbugs.gnu.org To: "'Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen'" , Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 14 01:59:22 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh9Ks-0008Qm-00 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 01:59:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52999 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh9Kr-0001qJ-8w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:59:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50464) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh9Kb-0001pt-FV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:59:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh9Ka-0001Es-LA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:59:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35544) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh9Ka-0001Eo-B8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:59:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh9KZ-0001JY-7x; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:59:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:59:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6491 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6491-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6491.13106015425044 (code B ref 6491); Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:59:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6491) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jul 2011 23:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh9KX-0001JJ-6y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:59:01 -0400 Original-Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com ([148.87.113.117]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh9KV-0001J8-JW for 6491@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:59:00 -0400 Original-Received: from rtcsinet22.oracle.com (rtcsinet22.oracle.com [66.248.204.30]) by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id p6DNwplU008533 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:58:53 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt357.oracle.com (acsmt357.oracle.com [141.146.40.157]) by rtcsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6DNwo76010602 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:58:51 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt102.oracle.com (abhmt102.oracle.com [141.146.116.54]) by acsmt357.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p6DNwiec007505; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 18:58:44 -0500 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/130.35.178.194) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:58:44 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AcxBt/HkJ6+pIYXnT1Gz/ADxggNr6AAAELjw X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109 X-Source-IP: rtcsinet22.oracle.com [66.248.204.30] X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090208.4E1E313D.00DE:SCFSTAT5015188, ss=1, re=-4.000, fgs=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:59:03 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:48962 Archived-At: > I think it may be logical for the marks to go away if you re-list the > buffers, but I'm not sure. Does anybody have an opinion on this? Relisting (e.g. `g') does erase all marks in *Buffer List*. I'm not sure it should, however. Seems to me that Dired should perhaps be the model here, and `g' does *not* erase marks in Dired. It is easy enough to erase all marks in the buffer list: `M->' followed by leaning on the Backspace key. However, we could also add a key to erase all marks. Dired does that with `M-DEL RET'.