From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33870: 27.0.50; xref-goto-xref not configurable Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2019 10:03:51 +0100 Message-ID: <5C31C477.9040108@gmx.at> References: <87a7ktqqx7.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <9215183d-0a44-88b5-5b3c-d0da31f749ad@yandex.ru> <878t02egph.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <878t011lch.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83lg403o9c.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2dq8z9n.fsf@mail.linkov.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1546765388 20551 195.159.176.226 (6 Jan 2019 09:03:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2019 09:03:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 33870@debbugs.gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Juri Linkov , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 06 10:03:03 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from listsout.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gg4Kj-0005AA-Js for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2019 10:03:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55068 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gg4Mq-0002FH-9L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2019 04:05:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggsout.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56224 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gg4Mj-0002Dg-TI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2019 04:05:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gg4Mg-00065a-Ng for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2019 04:05:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugsout.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44183) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gg4Mg-00064S-I4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2019 04:05:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gg4Mg-0003Bi-3L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2019 04:05:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2019 09:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33870 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 33870-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33870.154676544712179 (code B ref 33870); Sun, 06 Jan 2019 09:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33870) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2019 09:04:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48222 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gg4Lm-0003AN-Qj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2019 04:04:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:48689) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gg4Lk-00039r-Gz for 33870@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2019 04:04:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.5.2]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M4WRI-1hVa6B2Nhc-00yjzH; Sun, 06 Jan 2019 10:03:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87r2dq8z9n.fsf@mail.linkov.net> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:nDVcVmBSz/gW99vgBgb62SdRwpd2Emr+1tlMEvGpoXpGuzxshRb qX7HAOUOt+XUP3r9UVG7JFuY7aDB1aaE8ubijSAAlgXJYe3ukyfW3Dng3ybSXEcY5qV+DnM aiTmo9BTvfvlVETu9+2nrCGnb/cBH1Bk6iWUUM6U35FQnG9EhFqdcFvBJTQrmyt1ch87eur IiZKtbZuks3sk1qXfBCBA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:4Qg+b1j/H9U=:Ue67tUCGtedL4uO+FDQOZy xT08toVDXEOMJw/nD55HpQ6n8kJ9yRwTvXW5Sd0LfymHlK/EFihf7RB8/fioBn45SdASXe8HG /9T7UtEv1N6i/r6ZRhMJU7qfTVpspkIk8TkRrJi+Tlh6rT1jiQEzGiAhjHi/vaz7EAOqDSfwv 6UnuaRmzs6jc7nkWrMrw1/zFQ9/SCnUarDVuxhQ0dlIffHyPYupXPim61w5uqIt0GYEiKYrUv KYyZodLdORpRzMaExcMSMWZ5e1XSutm0GrZrZlhdrUIUdZycQhmtpevoca0TucV+dslQYsrZu sVNzp+7v/eQAXX+NLxJW918MU4UWccVa58RvcgbJE6H/gWejS9xeDQFGGNakmyMxup7x0ygMY 1t2l3OK1nn57ReHST2LUyJbPkFBvZ1bMg6SPJuYaLKRQpzm9OPA/0djAIukLZMvUYlIN9Zpux RBlEEBDX6STsYB/PqO8AbiS9gDmwFP9ZHXqTFOaxMSxK5ujSsHL7JiYU55y2thaNrU51hjLAw H5XMckci+Jr3aBT+HTG+RtT7HNYDbTkp3EYJkLBkXLqSRyaSzESZXyAV+clUDuK7kXfp41EtM bA0U03kK4kX72QlRrdMsl4J8D2a7NXv2lbRJz8qU9tIQZwHu0VLu4DypZH2oSDhvAaUXRSJza bU58l2N1xyZgp1vW5t2SZLi45e12HgeDk/ZjG7ubAS3NnW7qMOkH+a/HRb5pExN4jxpAcQ149 4Kwk455JOON29IpUjn04RuwdQO4qSd6OwCZaE5SGBdieTc4DE0Q0RaqWgkqJl5NjVgeaipR0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:154185 Archived-At: > display-buffer--maybe-at-bottom can be renamed to > display-buffer-maybe-at-bottom without a deprecation alias > because it was added in Emacs 27. The 'display-buffer--maybe-' functions are macros in disguise invented by Chong to simplify coding the rest. Unless we can't avoid it, I would not make them public because then we would have to (1) document them, (2) explain the semantics of the "maybe" and (3) justify why the remaining 'display-buffer--maybe-' functions are not public. Also note that 'display-buffer' resizes a window iff that window is new or always has shown the buffer to display before. There's one thing about 'display-buffer-at-bottom' that stupefies me: Here (let (split-width-threshold) (setq window (window--try-to-split-window bottom-window alist))) we bind =E2=80=98split-width-threshold=E2=80=99 so we can split the botto= m window into two side by side windows. I recently found a branch of mine where I bind 'split-height-threshold' to nil instead and now cannot remember what we really wanted - split that window horizontally or vertically. Can you? In either case feel free to change that to what you consider the more appropriate binding - maybe even binding both. Thanks, martin