From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33921: 27.0.50; Default height is inconsistently - and apparently also incorrectly - documented Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 20:01:07 +0100 Message-ID: <5C2915F3.9080606@gmx.at> References: <877efrxrpe.fsf@metalevel.at> <5C28DCEB.909@gmx.at> <83zhsn3uk9.fsf@gnu.org> <5C290495.5060207@gmx.at> <83tviu4zju.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1546196406 22627 195.159.176.226 (30 Dec 2018 19:00:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 19:00:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 33921@debbugs.gnu.org, triska@metalevel.at To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 30 20:00:02 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gdgJe-0005mc-7V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 20:00:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45960 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gdgLl-0006DU-5T for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 14:02:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56182) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gdgLf-0006DC-L1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 14:02:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gdgLb-0007gW-Io for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 14:02:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39241) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gdgLa-0007f4-GG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 14:02:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gdgLa-0002Mf-Cz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 14:02:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 19:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33921 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 33921-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33921.15461964769011 (code B ref 33921); Sun, 30 Dec 2018 19:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33921) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Dec 2018 19:01:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42607 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gdgKq-0002LH-6Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 14:01:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:44169) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gdgKo-0002L2-W3 for 33921@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 14:01:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([46.125.249.115]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lx8OH-1hNpl73T6f-016g9X; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 20:01:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83tviu4zju.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:T/Xm8qvpHQCAPM/sOGZbj2/gCdfxP0B14zxHixf5TsMDsMGqXgE 4nWAcG2SI/CC/n3a+nc7Vz0rjPEsQ9VCsfXaV/Q5fksdutxM4LqeJ/HEvsOgzbsli3eBjot Z65y0cC9/mAJ4XrV0UkTSJZDlvzqdvLcNCSP/ycHvYHq5MSNMlWfaFjHtL70+cRwxW6gz12 ILx5ZGHlV6pliNzMTlt5w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:1V4Vn/frThs=:Y44LgXiV8ucMfg41up1X2a FiMHeLVdSpJfm7hl9HftzmP0eR/01Cyr9xSjx8/7NAp/ChOHqYCDsWkSWB3u2UBGORsjqZ2OF +qvq00+R6Mb+MHuW8c+3Es/sHEcOUmnEg/U2Mqfl1BQfysO2r/vLdc0ZXHJua7bngkf8LUt+p n84F/BuAYuNfEZMpL44/FAVyyo0VUp9In7etx49CmBkJQfaZL5M/9r1v6EkziYa8JhcerWx5k YXsWzpxsVJSc/WCyua97xVpyVRppQqDTXXkPvtED+YfxOUalc22pA5Fa+Gnm2dpy5uqnPKzvO t69vuK83ad3CcSxrH8QlUEfqncObJnYqqYXkCovcG6IUjyyCUuCPubo0YjftNOVvBF9rFORIV u1qL9L1Vomnplrb1sKDoKMnJKGzDIS8qaRF1Zf7SPaZwZyureb2IFBDIacpkAxNSpqqMpNSxP fgyhysxysM97QHarQAM90M3KUjRgsMpCVmDs2FtlT02D8A5vlGW1Hf/IN0WRkUxuffnNRFKfe ktOGW4Vw6GnBMAcqlx9fVDUkxFMQr9cPrgfoZF/cvMdZQ+jF7zo6gOaliTJcpQ2ydPJ2FgInI u+UdumtXoy7N78PUtsiUp98DLvU+r/GU7p8oGc6SQ6ure1bTxE/evEJbkFn/0PEGl03RshwOy m/8t2sZwAjfo0VXaeEmceKQ4rBISrJA5X+RtEBpMF7yBWCOBvXqKkY4bfYd/51orL66q9dTPe vvhIKypyaT9fwb+elY5UPm3RlwgOPzMVIkQs/NuucQUOQvjoVsnPPVr0GPZ7gq8xQa+UiId0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:154034 Archived-At: >> The value of evaluating (frame-height) should be 36 if nothing special >> has been specified. > > That's definitely not true for TTY frames. I mentioned the GUI restriction a few lines below. > Fine with me, but I'd be very surprised if we conclude that 36 is an > accurate number in enough situations to cite it in the manual. It's a default we specify explicitly. When OS or WM interfere all bets are off obviously. martin