From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#32790: 27.0.50; point jumps unexpectedly after delete-window Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 08:40:35 +0100 Message-ID: <5BF7AEF3.9060003@gmx.at> References: <87efdnsp2k.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5BA490EA.4000502@gmx.at> <87y39m9f8b.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5BF65D7F.2090805@gmx.at> <874lc8g2ix.fsf@mail.linkov.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1542958749 2714 195.159.176.226 (23 Nov 2018 07:39:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 07:39:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 32790@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 23 08:39:05 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gQ63M-0000cA-Qn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 08:39:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50846 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gQ65T-0004oX-Ac for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 02:41:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52591) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gQ65J-0004o9-Oj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 02:41:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gQ65G-0001hy-TW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 02:41:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38701) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gQ65G-0001hP-OM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 02:41:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gQ65G-00024x-LX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 02:41:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 07:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32790 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 32790-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32790.15429588577965 (code B ref 32790); Fri, 23 Nov 2018 07:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 32790) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Nov 2018 07:40:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42958 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gQ65A-00024P-Re for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 02:40:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:55919) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gQ659-00024D-Ew for 32790@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 02:40:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([213.162.73.4]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MH5Sw-1gCKQG1cyQ-00Dopy; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 08:40:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: <874lc8g2ix.fsf@mail.linkov.net> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:8DwFozD0+jcUqq4K7PTmmRJYBiN7SxPR+si8o9jLNPO4n4Yn4hO l1kJQKu7Z9n/4cS4oYHUODyfyombSv/bJb7seLGnDVBSi/e9Zs9G2TMXk/7c1oWu32vm9Xj yioWP3TQc60AExT1IRGv/FuJlTX/DfjjKM0h0opecmg06FovZWdSBIhOxZSfOlU1Jfr97RZ BBYGppz4UFWBWtmIPhjxQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:JGF3VLPhjaw=:7GBP406YBimM+ReWo+jWa9 O8zXUPD1mcWvhhcPBXftOmEkcjXZuiLJmPmMyufHHAqNxZ9A8yYyXHlm4Wh/ZvT9OUiGab/aP DBdMK4XKZGArRwo+hgGk6x+XLQI9cdoIIzSaiSBIWFNiPgut6Qk/Rd5WODblPBujzcLA3EDxA 5YzFWdmJ2wWYrjnemXQHsJGLMwgwaIT59w/jY11sk61HLi0C4Mn8+Of2hBfCYMat83jLdw8BL egRuat+DFTebG+wgZbNPnr6t2VFaJ5Ow4UEuc74Pgm8hxlRE7BW8NctyBK9JtszGLYz/gv/Xa Qz81Y+hNGQzjdOD9tw86EEosgJy0JlxlsCrL6Qmq14+DEjT9TLjnkHu8yJNqpbFXuBsbfT25K OSSpfS9IGDQVpXbbV0BoaX5jXpZhBGB4RCBeSk91uy1t5jCUC0y83Mlqki4+BSdxF2NN3XXVD 9wX7d38E9AqbWCWTkBhCY2HFU+1RuS1NQLAqaeTJOntPsnP8B9d694jq/t/lApu2vh2IcXMf/ E0JFV1l1UNDAfyxBiR07ex88yXGCFsruly6eRxU3qjOwVtuZ3oHWSryIUEi60zJQGtog5Ln30 2Yc6j5KDMjuM+SUkIl0a3jeTlTKsxZhw6nYRI+kTKdQOf/qZj8P/oaWaPPZOkwtPwjyRtTfTQ LDBrZbnkEdXSnU1zUAWydxDJmKqJOTjIL+0FILH4olqyI2QZ3Yh2VMKxhAwS4hboLYuTCcMi6 T9W6gyLXDFbixnIBfc05amFBn73NSiZ6+++c1opPDHQ5xIJWgvdUZnmGkfJdlrlJvbFK6Dao X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:152700 Archived-At: >>> + ((and (window-minibuffer-p other-window) >>> + (not (minibuffer-window-active-p other-window))) >>> + (user-error "Minibuffer is inactive")) >> >> Should we try to delete the active minibuffer window? > > Interesting question. Do you think it's worth the trouble > to implement special handling of the minibuffer: > > 1. when a window in the below direction is requested to be deleted > from the bottom window, and the minibuffer is active, > then call (abort-recursive-edit) This looks counter-intuitive unless we are also able to delete the minibuffer window. > 2. when the selected bottom window is requested to be deleted > and selection is requested to be moved in the below direction, > then the minibuffer's window should be selected. If it's active, presumably. I'm not sure, but I wouldn't do that in a first version. BTW, if you delete the window on the right frame border and want selection to move to the right, does it wrap around to the window on the left? martin