From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31745: =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=9B=9E=E5=A4=8D=EF=BC=9A?= bug#31745: =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=9B=9E=E5=A4=8D=EF=BC=9A=E5=9B=9E=E5=A4=8D=EF=BC=9ARe:_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=9B=9E=E5=A4=8D=EF=BC=9Abug#31745:?= Frame's bug whenwindow-system Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2018 11:02:00 +0200 Message-ID: <5B389888.2060003@gmx.at> References: <878t7pms1e.fsf@gmail.com> <87r2lho3cg.fsf@gmail.com> <5B2CB9B3.1000600@gmx.at> <87r2ky2852.fsf@gmail.com> <5B2E077E.7070907@gmx.at> <871scsr4bj.fsf@gmail.com> <5B34962C.6050408@gmx.at> <871scrpbap.fsf@gmail.com> <5B349D71.3090301@gmx.at> <87tvpnnuuw.fsf@gmail.com> <5B34D3B0.3060302@gmx.at> <87in63ateo.fsf@gmail.com> <5B35F0DA.108@gmx.at> <87vaa1ajp4.fsf@gmail.com> <5B374084.20505@gmx.at> <87in60ab7p.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1530435820 9476 195.159.176.226 (1 Jul 2018 09:03:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2018 09:03:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 31745@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=88=98=E5=8A=9B=E9=93=AD?= To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 01 11:03:35 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fZYGc-0002Mm-OM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2018 11:03:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53683 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fZYIk-0008LR-6k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2018 05:05:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51318) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fZYG9-0005Q3-KJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2018 05:03:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fZYG6-0007EJ-GO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2018 05:03:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33709) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fZYG6-0007EA-Cp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2018 05:03:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fZYG6-0004TF-3I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2018 05:03:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2018 09:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31745 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 31745-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31745.153043573817116 (code B ref 31745); Sun, 01 Jul 2018 09:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31745) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jul 2018 09:02:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41603 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fZYFO-0004S0-HN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2018 05:02:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:43997) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fZYFN-0004Rn-7g for 31745@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2018 05:02:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([46.125.250.78]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LiWzQ-1g7VTz3ChA-00cfoE; Sun, 01 Jul 2018 11:02:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87in60ab7p.fsf@gmail.com> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:dQI29Ek38X3pQPKoxP8NsJE9AMe+xWMw/GRUsnpgrHBxWjNpccn nYlPWVJKxzPXCo+PO0pAHVRG5O6XFnp78Vb6xwT/j9GjuRspzfoapTqFZOfdQ2ZJdfc1+99 XH5IasVmQbrS2gDlfgABF21nwHK5RQY9JYxY4oC/lCKd3jWV07TvezKNjTxAeRQLIzF4REH vpJ4aQadJheWyH67rbUJw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:DPclTULETvQ=:7OswXpUF80eR/ZSfLJ5qsN vcSMkDsdwC9w7mhyT889moMj94Vrk0tSZm3W6WAGVpYXpGSOaX/EPqiEwK8IKM5KHkRVPRcZu p9wkXQI4KIgTULdd1wZjW9udpMhJdAlATN7PG7iXqxibKer4SCfL0AwlgdmY3VWr4vLra7HAa LdT000ZIY+E0brb6v37MBQQevlxJcmqwnM+TG+tN2kZYUn4VAI+rIAkb7n7tna8XEbLp2p1HZ JoSjakWDWquGT09nFEoNYJhWfBPaspN5xBJqPVvBU2anYk7KQv3Yl4auqmCb+H9NCj6B6+vpc 7QfAwWod9FPUxbFBHP+31OGweSFQu9qLh4TZnCGlj3+HSBqFmWw+eYO7T1jgXSIingiLr+o0j /v6kIOvCjSQAmBnUTKcMK/lVnS1LRcPfOqFLycrZgkSfEPLfoqHdSxOji4NJshkubmhT+ihB+ eprrgDW3eh3JOpEtKUzPW1u3eAWt9mwL5KidJTXDURmOk5cHz+uholbRYAItNye1OqFCP5r4R X4f/BwiXzebq9pHdDO0/StZkbZ8HjybBAiBNZwnt+WxTs6MeISIjj5E66CFtdct9RXquMtkFp SvxfCoVZxsPhcMeHAxNyfI32xQu4AA8xoyTwcqyx5kWD5czbRXbr85I82b4XWTUVwe7CQtSJL VkgzjVLony1F/1rGQ6QuYp7LfJKqCMZOLJG6GBlwUFvOhZGz3gpAPocVW5oOax2f/5fL7Iydn +NBNUsSyznHZiQ6cWbW/NtcnJnhVHIdyzkAlrcESd0mKZgxGZWaaeLeiT9PxSYabwYhdQaMg X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:148042 Archived-At: >>From the *scratch* buffer, after emacs has finished displaying the > initial frame. Then let's ignore the initial frame behavior for the moment and concentrate on this. We have to find out the reason why the window manager might refuse to resize our frame as requested. There can't be many of them. Either the size wrt to the frame's position is too large. This could be verified by finding a corresponding threshold value beyond which the frame cannot be resized. Or the value specified does not result in an integral multiple of character sizes. This could be verified by setting 'frame-resize-pixelwise' to t. I can't see any other reason. Can you? In either case it would be interesting to have a look at the sources of the window manager you use. martin