From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31745: =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=9B=9E=E5=A4=8D=EF=BC=9A?= bug#31745: =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=9B=9E=E5=A4=8D=EF=BC=9A=E5=9B=9E=E5=A4=8D=EF=BC=9ARe:_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=9B=9E=E5=A4=8D=EF=BC=9Abug#31745:?= Frame's bug whenwindow-system Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2018 10:34:12 +0200 Message-ID: <5B374084.20505@gmx.at> References: <878t7pms1e.fsf@gmail.com> <87r2lho3cg.fsf@gmail.com> <5B2CB9B3.1000600@gmx.at> <87r2ky2852.fsf@gmail.com> <5B2E077E.7070907@gmx.at> <871scsr4bj.fsf@gmail.com> <5B34962C.6050408@gmx.at> <871scrpbap.fsf@gmail.com> <5B349D71.3090301@gmx.at> <87tvpnnuuw.fsf@gmail.com> <5B34D3B0.3060302@gmx.at> <87in63ateo.fsf@gmail.com> <5B35F0DA.108@gmx.at> <87vaa1ajp4.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1530347597 30171 195.159.176.226 (30 Jun 2018 08:33:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2018 08:33:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 31745@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=88=98=E5=8A=9B=E9=93=AD?= To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 30 10:33:12 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fZBJg-0007ki-1x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 10:33:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46089 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fZBLn-0004eU-AR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 04:35:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55816) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fZBLV-0004bW-CX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 04:35:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fZBLS-00025U-8u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 04:35:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60666) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fZBLS-000258-4A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 04:35:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fZBLR-0007tA-RU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 04:35:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2018 08:35:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31745 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 31745-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31745.153034766730281 (code B ref 31745); Sat, 30 Jun 2018 08:35:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31745) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jun 2018 08:34:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40330 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fZBKt-0007sL-9B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 04:34:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:47325) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fZBKr-0007s8-DL for 31745@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 04:34:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.5.200]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Li0dC-1fuoyq1csE-00n8kg; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 10:34:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87vaa1ajp4.fsf@gmail.com> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:FhJZE7uuf3FjedfXxvpIZtdu0dOWUG5ruVpLPM1Nf8gad1ljQtN BYnzkJTfjh3NcBmcdTZnJcbz+cqWhdVzzq79aZp1w7tA83GiwfzZEoxU2TsK4AoCQGAjsns umTAhp4vHkUrlB7fatWcDTj2wiFUhIr7c0JR7rEICMy5fHxr3dbogSni1NJeMckfHfPHQ1P O+v7NvAoTGUNBDZTrrvqQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:E3JWKTlDnWs=:K5tesgDsyNmHj6fAV1nPhe ik25xdLipsW7Aoh4K97kaDkxpsL8mU0vl4vTYocftAiR8TcBUmy6itwyPIMkQE7Frv3nqq43V PMl2jSYFGtdnKvjdeJQ6h2ZvSEc815PWfr+apTcxNcmgCj9f05ILcjzWPqLvUDVnL0JgqmWX2 Cm8r93L0CJa8ikUpLR+8LBwwAEHoHrgkJ3Zc0Snu1jJK1D80XUSX+p/3B7glg34sfrJdJ7X1D dDpw31CFc83SuoZz+vLQuxqm7fslhy3/qEv/Jvqb9XwPDNf0pwmQgGRi6W9JzTePeHW0cxzpE k61b5BOTPzOSs7OoRwJPJaM8zlykxMXveqq87gRq9Ad/vN7Ih3j3dNb/uLIIDe0AdvXb3ZZVK 2L5Q4s8lh3zBVxkw9pzqx2+TFWFis24IYHaq9dizPoPEL5VoCIdb4Ti1fYo6MyY3lFqvJDkjZ houn/WN0VoiH3hqP7IyAW5gk+3wv8rNGN7FZ3JSZGiRhb8C/HqxC5RGPxVN0KC6UvKLlQhNlG 7XWSftp4NNerJgmqPzdLU+353VL54AasNZopfqSTmhb54PVLO28hdsPott7cNXOLLdn0WYiGp SwQJ4M+I27QHlgOqhSOyvqBtIXGyxwZYTtJKOOh87heAm6SS1g+MJhOrT/zKZdBC1KUH0EJFy m5eAUb1O5NTsZH6Fp1PErQDuubS0V+sQDazNOCZK4H1vEw8d3Kzfcl8sCXbh/TvizVpgATJ+6 QkPMtom45Lgg61a7rxiMmpK89EM4nQxtAY/bEE8aiWGHGh5wIe9D/f0io5VLccGaEvNZLDwW X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:147996 Archived-At: > xterm -geometry 80x36+-50+-50 > > but the resulting window is always fully visible. It=CA=BCs possible t= he > window manager hasn't fully implemented support for negative offsets, > it=CA=BCs somewhat obscure. It's normal - some window managers simply refuse to position an initial window partially offscreen. I have to return to my earlier request which you replied to as follows: >> (modify-frame-parameters nil '((left . 0) (top . 0) (width . 130) (he= ight . 56))) >> > > That does nothing, but the following resizes the frame: > > (modify-frame-parameters nil '((left . 0) (top . 0) (width . 100) (hei= ght . 48))) > > And has done the right thing: > > (frame-parameter nil 'height) =3D> 48 > (frame-parameter nil 'width) =3D> 100 Did you call 'modify-frame-parameters' in your initial file or in the initial frame? I was interested in the latter. martin