From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31745: =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=9B=9E=E5=A4=8D=EF=BC=9A?= bug#31745: =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=9B=9E=E5=A4=8D=EF=BC=9A=E5=9B=9E=E5=A4=8D=EF=BC=9ARe:_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=9B=9E=E5=A4=8D=EF=BC=9Abug#31745:?= Frame's bug whenwindow-system Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:02:52 +0200 Message-ID: <5B34962C.6050408@gmx.at> References: <878t7pms1e.fsf@gmail.com> <87r2lho3cg.fsf@gmail.com> <5B2CB9B3.1000600@gmx.at> <87r2ky2852.fsf@gmail.com> <5B2E077E.7070907@gmx.at> <871scsr4bj.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1530173004 22688 195.159.176.226 (28 Jun 2018 08:03:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 08:03:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 31745@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=88=98=E5=8A=9B=E9=93=AD?= To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 28 10:03:20 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fYRtf-0005p0-Tn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:03:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34974 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYRvn-0003sl-AE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 04:05:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58860) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYRuQ-00031Z-1Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 04:04:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYRuM-0003bm-U9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 04:04:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58480) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYRuM-0003bb-Qs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 04:04:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fYRuM-0006Jl-Iz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 04:04:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 08:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31745 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 31745-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31745.153017299524212 (code B ref 31745); Thu, 28 Jun 2018 08:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31745) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2018 08:03:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38141 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fYRta-0006IR-HF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 04:03:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:49611) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fYRtZ-0006IC-4N for 31745@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 04:03:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.5.19]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M4Wwq-1gLrgI0JdU-00ydSu; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:03:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: <871scsr4bj.fsf@gmail.com> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:g0Nscwe0cVxmY/W1zVcXY3UVcXXViMUgbwg9T82gMGEUcRaBA1L RW/BB6ZGNH18SXqfejI4pj9FECHc5gu9JLbfGOKIoaEYNfY9lCLogYqbbJNZ0IKJnMO6fAp UxInh1j0EqisErd56hNBNyHiP7qMs5J5bOGl0j5hE2akDw5Tln4d0aQzRYz2l2tiDhhmjYd OkMh/BlO6BSohYM107P9g== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:/Ypl4fh8vSM=:7BhRWAgSoRDnZQr1b7LVXl dbYU6NYGyxn7Ooqu6dolTWYzRX8Y8YHmuLXEsdTqgF9ms4B4foG1DjfIt5b0AabKsMeOXyldK fy+0ecimz8vp5RQq203DXkot9ExHZM0nCnWEUjP7AG3BrRureFfktdNGIpo4NC8sRMsnYYtM9 VtiCKfBxMNxphCSwp0gD0sV9X4xtN4n2C/dmZhfg/KrZcsfbJ1JBqa9btm6MuXXKSInlSNUOB S0bodgjoIDYnsD/r4xQTr+8GmHbH1iCtdKQ8m3dueKm+5DpU9L0nTxns89hzdiDh+enAuTZT6 Cx5jXN4a1khwgoa8qgxtsobzOoDghwdL2/R0qrqv+7T/jdRlEUbeMYQ0OEzoHzoSeN/mRiEB8 mle2k/n0rbkc1Y2+bX/VWxf10VmfWbDybt1x4+xqBuZc7Req4I7N2jCEulBXIOyoQOoZ/YPi6 AeOH9YjZhZ35K1AmKtwVHGTasZxKyKCRLH7/5TT/WJqThqr4wqGFYptAT7k29bvFoYvTH+aBR aQjLTNRAOAk1YCRKYYdpDmjSVoH95b01GXG8Nq9ycgh2TM20M4FAuchLIcwnARvJXuhzNKZvT AEyS10lE3+HO1s7WTAgeZwXJbXdMWs45pPTyRd7MVptWyGpo2pkIOnnWf99hu0XkQqLNyAJxa XmEiUToSvSFBVuS/1oSip2U966RmkKX8XQvu2AX1X8o7vxqPuw4ugGCcFPbxYVCA3Ows0N6DB 8dnQczi67ABNef+jF7mNZHXPqUCz70WI6bi5NJspnrIWLh5u3Cj6eesidunfldZVoOgnbC7E X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:147894 Archived-At: > Yes, plus parts of emacs obviously believe the frame-parameters, since > the minibuffer and modeline are not visible. > >> What did you use to produce this and does it only happen with scaling? >> I still do not understand the nature of this bug in the first place. > > src/emacs -q --no-site-file --no-site-lisp --no-splash --eval '(setq > x-wait-for-event-timeout nil)' -l ../emacs-real-26/31745.el > > (although it happens with non-nil x-wait-for-event-timeout as well) > where 31745.el is based off the original reporter's .emacs (attached). Hmmm... Does the behavior reproduce just with emacs -Q --eval "(setq default-frame-alist '((left . 0) (top . 0) (width . 130) (height . 56)))" 56 lines is by default too large for my screen so I can't see the modeline either. But I suppose that's not what you both mean. Also, when you evaluate (setq default-frame-alist '((left . 0) (top . 0) (width . 130) (height . 56))) in such a miscreated frame does it turn to the expected state? BTW we still don't have any valid toolkit/window manager details for this report yet. Could you please provide some? martin