From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28605: 26.0.60; Part of leftmost character hidden Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:02:33 +0100 Message-ID: <5A38B989.3040402@gmx.at> References: <59CE8E74.5010308@gmx.at> <59D35549.6030905@gmx.at> <87wp4c750c.fsf@gmail.com> <59D4A45F.5010606@gmx.at> <87tvzfjfcp.fsf@gmail.com> <59D5E8F6.8080002@gmx.at> <87efqikk0x.fsf@gmail.com> <87a815lq3w.fsf@gmail.com> <59D73C6F.3020907@gmx.at> <87o9pk65ae.fsf@gmail.com> <59D74E49.2000605@gmx.at> <87a8145wcr.fsf@gmail.com> <59DCCA92.8090501@gmx.at> <87tvz7m319.fsf@gmail.com> <5A341195.20008@gmx.at> <87zi6gjaed.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1513666880 15901 195.159.176.226 (19 Dec 2017 07:01:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 07:01:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ola Nilsson , Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 28605@debbugs.gnu.org, Kaushal To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 19 08:01:15 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eRBtr-0003im-2M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:01:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54658 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRBvm-0002iv-Il for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 02:03:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46116) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRBvg-0002iC-I6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 02:03:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRBvc-0002W7-Gi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 02:03:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60656) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRBvc-0002VF-DT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 02:03:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eRBva-0006Id-C3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 02:03:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 07:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28605 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28605-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28605.151366697224201 (code B ref 28605); Tue, 19 Dec 2017 07:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28605) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2017 07:02:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41104 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eRBvQ-0006IH-6a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 02:02:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:60075) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eRBvN-0006I3-RH for 28605@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 02:02:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([46.125.249.17]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lcjgd-1etLc52hfT-00k5w1; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:02:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87zi6gjaed.fsf@gmail.com> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Bp8GS9S1OkLX8KNu9ROQKTNeaISOsKVfVn3yIYatu6C7uVns/Pq LA0aE9lw4vcGqORBYMgDmGbAnGQWcHJKQEuLUBrr/iMUeUshPjaoLRnbHNModwm7jtE+dTN OHm2J9nWdZMjWxwEbAxm+myLenL4U3UgFN9dFILS58SOh9VP/kK/emEUhhZuQzXFw7oTGis F8E2P/lbuTiz9cOYM0VGA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:WQhhCFPJUVk=:Y6mtftRHYEOdOJNRmnaHdC fSt2E1wJDZx5im5/8DXO1vniWOaFhdRlXhlnVklQKvoBTDkRZbpkomtU18L8g4J3gU1krH1s4 bSqZTL2VYKbN7Uv5Ml6Qkh8T2pP5AZIrp6bsqkkp9OpApnuktxfrRL9TlHwIRjZM+quYHau93 h+KN9TRkjXuY2xzcuqJkkq6dxSCXi0HiP31M++eTinniVy6QZwzxCaB6VYoLhCZGeAKmRH7PO KwYWBxidQxqZX/f/cgUnfUBoMgEM63ZwamMQ/69QMBl7l8ehii6YTEa6i615F3Issm5UzKelq 3UaUdLtJM3nuJPuZQg+KShQvTJVFxqaUGsOJxm26UMSEGar2JCXcJP3LgNpmR/QuxJvsQvCz3 WAxp3LvObYUYZAhaCpQtkTvBGIrplTvDZfZa5gcQ1hB8PrxkzmAj3Xymi+hGrWNNa2Lg84Ih6 ymiQ6sxru/4PvzuPji2CBbA4dhGFuTSuJMVBreS/5O/wG8wz/ADE3G/9ROnNGU7ZlcrkkwBKg QhuyU1nkkTLc5a2OnQU7GLaiO92ew0giXciTTkSMEn/F/I9hM0DxG3rcVzwzkFw1SobKz8Yw8 tMw/YOsUweXP8zAJgmM0qrtVC2ooT8VggJK7myxsZokGSIpVjEk39kN8f+QTq/rE+a9c0wGy5 MH4195GemtUlUA9sGruFljo7TIHRBsnyr0X5AwnPfF83bK0nA+jsSJ+ukEBo5A3zQK1pj2Y6b R8Z7yC/z66sn0ZfR3oGfw3dDEa6XYjGnaEeGQk8F4BpFLu/NHCFIphqnFiPZluvnAnctfArX X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:141245 Archived-At: > I'm perfectly happy to have it applied by someone with commit rights > (my paperwork is complete). As a bugfix I think it should go on the > release branch, but that's not my decision to make. Eli, is it OK to install Robert's patch on the release branch? To me it seems the best we have so far and any glitches it might add should be tolerable. And it could suppress complaints that some faulty behavior now already persists through three or four Emacs versions ... martin