From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27923: 24.3; -iconic switch screws up geometry Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 10:04:33 +0100 Message-ID: <5A0D54A1.3020307@gmx.at> References: <5995604A.3050605@gmx.at> <59980B16.1020307@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1510823125 18612 195.159.176.226 (16 Nov 2017 09:05:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:05:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 27923@debbugs.gnu.org To: Geoff Kuenning Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 16 10:05:15 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eFG6k-0004Dz-7p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 10:05:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39666 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eFG6r-00063M-8k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 04:05:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37217) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eFG6e-0005zO-Lk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 04:05:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eFG6Z-00052L-GT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 04:05:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33856) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eFG6Z-0004wh-7L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 04:05:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eFG6Y-0007ZZ-IP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 04:05:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27923 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 27923-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27923.151082309529089 (code B ref 27923); Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27923) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Nov 2017 09:04:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42537 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eFG6R-0007Z7-2g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 04:04:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:57144) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eFG6P-0007Yr-1Y for 27923@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 04:04:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([46.125.250.87]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M9sa0-1eLtvX3uci-00B4Rh; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 10:04:44 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:2NRKSTbtuhTZHO2JQYNRZXSdnozGbONZgeVd0fZ9zKvfvcuaLAX HxkQTIHk7SG4t8t+H2KD8L9uthR7ve9HIcKPFAAk0cepAI3BXE2vEyQGUuG+MRB9Us+jNeO InFPsZh4acF12MiL6S4eK5noXuZSlQc2K0gEa1CVYpDY7++J8cfoEFR+CJxNKTpBTLdJLyP 8bLgICw9U5yoDAAmmVkdA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:AJxAAN4c+24=:iwXA2HOCXnFMLZggDNstJ0 1f/MzF+i3qTvMpwEGjOG98CipfjupzZCO2Af8tE/pv00fhwdaE29kBtcepvhdW6ovKAxNM6C1 Shi09VhTIW9/HrjHqjhFEw+uKLoq7aW9EZTdfGbmJhQrM3/26DLYHz6+Mua5CC6lAcVEZv4a/ 5Z4B4c8rQXK/3R8kbOF0hCNTYy65KZ+mPF090vc1Hd4rZy+Avoz5V1+IWYDhAB5Zs1ftGD01j TFvPOywnrsux2m548blJ46NMO0JjsiC2jL/BdUl7vk0MySQAViUtIv4INVxIlsSxuRGFcZpoG gykXV1f9RPDP1YBatqyzuXaCvu6Du9a7Q6XBNT3BD94cwQvghFJq0nW2+VkFgoP+wD6rbk0vd /8M/gWyI1n0qlPPslDD1Wz7g3aF/8GHFEdipvlXgLCYHUGnkTXLOi70M9JLViI8A0mr5ja1RM 9gjPwhRtVj/xQaOm6EwtxJEZpEN5rqAOzIe/hcfgNPDPDQ0VwXCRHgAYVVbZyQiF24pGtHv15 IzjQsS9cH7FPDXF/5pgkqp6NKVmK6wfD3PD6bmvT9N42aSfdBwQMV1S+20mKqD1abDRZKJFZ1 dTMe2zi0rQB97yHMN6IyLATEy47/v7jXlQv/C46PMx3HJrKhSLwpc4X10C/rajYNFf3vY1CtX POnWXkM/HcYIz3h9Kf6vb4eYC3fubIEkWlnPcIYWtAjfeu4knCxCXeOuwzooEthKIzUWb60ir y3fjNsc+MpHujzqZyK1qgDtZzPjfQRHpKeNZ726rU735OyfiEJ0iXI5lopwqdrNl8IT+XgnD X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:139952 Archived-At: > FWIW, when I was doing the tests below there was a brief flash on my > screen each time I launched emacs, implying that the window is first > mapped and then unmapped. I don't know of that's related to the > problem. Do the flashes occur only when you load init.el or also when using the --iconic --geometry 80x78+1180+0 switches only? >> emacs -Q --iconic --geometry 80x78+1180+0 --font "-misc-fixed-bold-r-normal-*-15-*-100-100-*-*-ISO8859-1" > > This works correctly, but the geometry reported by xwininfo is 79x77+100+0 (which is related to my Emacs.geometry Xrdb setting rather than my gnuemacs.geometry). Do you mean that both sizes are off by one - 80/79 and 78/77 ? What do M-: (frame-width) RET and M-: (frame-height) in such a frame give? Did you remove/comment out the resource settings? IIRC Emacs combines everything it finds and applies the last settings it read. >> emacs -Q --iconic --load ~/init.el > > works entirely correctly with the first init.el (including correct X placement). > >> emacs -Q --load ~/init.el > > works entirely correctly with the second init.el. So apart from the flashes these would be OK? >> Also, please tell me what >> your original scenario gives with the line specifying the font setting >> removed from the resource file. > > That one still fails. "still" in the sense that you get the same bad width? Does removing the font setting change _anything_ in the appearance of the frame? Thanks, martin