From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#29095: Bug: The '20a09de953f437109a098fa8c4d380663d921481' merge increased my Emacs configuration loading time from 9 s to 60 s Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 08:13:22 +0100 Message-ID: <5A02AE92.6010201@gmx.at> References: <0899d792-c1fe-caa8-183e-298371d226a0@Alexander.Shukaev.name> <87h8ueaioy.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87zi858r9i.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87y3nl7g8l.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <59FEEDA4.4040602@gmx.at> <87d14u5ua1.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1510125256 22330 195.159.176.226 (8 Nov 2017 07:14:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 07:14:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 29095@debbugs.gnu.org, Alexander Shukaev To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 08 08:14:09 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eCKYq-0005UH-NB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 08:14:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57854 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCKYy-00022g-3C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 02:14:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55849) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCKYn-00021t-GN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 02:14:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCKYk-0008PD-An for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 02:14:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48800) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCKYk-0008P3-7O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 02:14:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eCKYj-0002Js-UT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 02:14:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 07:14:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29095 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 29095-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B29095.15101252298888 (code B ref 29095); Wed, 08 Nov 2017 07:14:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29095) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Nov 2017 07:13:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57481 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eCKYX-0002JI-1m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 02:13:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:62705) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eCKYV-0002J5-Mz for 29095@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 02:13:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([46.125.250.45]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LeiJ8-1f1J5u0m8E-00qPp1; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 08:13:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87d14u5ua1.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:vdiP2GRlEI4GHVHApjW1uN9EF2Fk9h5x/8ndyFbMlWUvtsma9K0 9OhyfHE47x6NhF1EDBifLPcFXUlBzV4WMgg0ForS9V6YW7gjLPEm/afCs7QCjyoU2GMLUIt UBSjKYiUXtTj1wlsk3Sne0LpZ/SVrlcKetSBrvR1ugmu0Afd2Zk9bSN8VxhC5fjYq0KHmxp jPgpcz9rL1egSUFYz3Tlg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:HnjgjS8sRfc=:yJlfaKXmDpzNc/qsxNz8kX AArtWfkxTzOm6aWAkh+dZr3ygpPnMD7q2ssfVpVSlPPIvWq93xDONkyZa2+L3lZ0zxHohIK+W WfpX5jd8v907xcRi/sZaD2M2mlw+7hSLC70tGvXijOE0NvT7AIkSSzlN0ys6VA31nQ0kKmZeg Sz6UIlxdEDUidV5J49yBTlcXlE+KbIb61Gee9x01CKowdXmZ9UY/w+SaA7Z7aQvb4LzHzmmVp 3e3cspZNAjcY4QkZm5WEVfGNzWz+jGYMjQNRG/vKatQDLlCA5SNLQSjlxsePVEZaNGjXgINTW 7VO/5MtqqxT6mXx+KDdNM5wggzd5DOPz2WmVhgWq7YGeUuD45I+BGymOQkl2+TNg19pW5KaOI YVJ/e9NBJX/S7DDcCQAT5QbQogxR/fl4WVtXWyDJQzbg4hTudeNixkP2p0w1npoqGNWXR9hMl 6TCV6ZCh3L+rv3wZQVYj/ABK92Pu/tpcHkrHG0KpNBzWCCBhxJHGXVwBiK2aahqA2U1lv8lUc 0g9bzgnMXTODT2PdNHHbCDLoMIgZTA+3603UEPYgrI0I7oig5mjQrujvXFHb2WhUZm1TVDQVa 3oWhcTaHB1aWka3TW3ylK0pebHgLwfvYF0UoaygNfWP8GgBVYFJ6OgspY7goaESaznpGNNa7w 5ffv2ecMDoAGoxIkCbT/ck+pvJ+tp33HAS/LOufp9rI++atJI88Nlgs9mbd46cMRM2NMNRsT9 pVNKUMw9KI0ShLPE7JzK3DQ4XxFzdaI0uCxFaBb4iVWLgEwDl6jINjOdtUpVs9NgCswz6kAC X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:139603 Archived-At: > Not sure what Alexander is using, but under i3 the problem is simply > that the frame doesn't become visible until the user switches to the > virtual workspace where Emacs is. So it's not that we have a visible > frame which the window manager fails to inform us about in time, rather > the frame just doesn't become visible in time. But as long as a user doesn't switch to that workspace she won't observe that making a new frame is slower. So I seem to be missing something. Anyway, we probably should add to /etc/PROBLEMS lines like "If a new Emacs frame is supposed to appear on a different virtual workspace, Emacs may not be notified about the visibility of the frame until the user switches to that workspace. If this causes ... one remedy is to customize ..." And I'd still be interested in Sasha's use case. martin