From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21509: 25.0.50; X11 error: BadPixmap when creating first emacsclient frame; and memory leak Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 11:40:54 +0200 Message-ID: <59E32D26.6030901@gmx.at> References: <877fno9w6b.fsf@secretsauce.net> <59ABD636.3070302@gmx.at> <87wp5d8y37.fsf@scrawny> <59AE5DD1.9050602@gmx.at> <87vaks8wul.fsf@scrawny> <59B39F76.2010508@gmx.at> <8760bhcbqm.fsf@secretsauce.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1508060538 32163 195.159.176.226 (15 Oct 2017 09:42:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 09:42:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21509@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dima Kogan Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 15 11:42:14 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e3fQt-0006xW-JC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 11:42:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56624 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e3fR0-0005zv-TW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 05:42:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39913) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e3fQr-0005zC-EM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 05:42:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e3fQo-0000re-7T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 05:42:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60512) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e3fQo-0000rZ-3Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 05:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e3fQn-0005Od-Sk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 05:42:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 09:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21509 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21509-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21509.150806046920667 (code B ref 21509); Sun, 15 Oct 2017 09:42:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21509) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2017 09:41:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40957 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e3fPx-0005NG-Du for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 05:41:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:64560) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e3fPw-0005N2-CV for 21509@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 05:41:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([46.125.250.23]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Mh6lB-1dqHIg3IsD-00MHRU; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 11:40:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8760bhcbqm.fsf@secretsauce.net> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ZprqC39X550mSGTFjy6f33jr1l+enaus+XjcyI49I1w6n0EP3lH X9nh0ytTsCkTI27aip63uLYU9zlYxTwL4ovqepZ6hWZGUcNW/wU/YIOccFXLsRzpxlsq3/H WkuORYKBe9gQp7gO5Th6y+wW6hnskmQGytAntaCwiszOvz2Z6sc3GBC3EXSrKWJ2hEIRQzD NVZW7wq5g3oFmMi+QemiQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:mZ/BSO2iPFs=:6lrwkQ+gMY1m4BmPxBpenL TFh1d6xa+6Hga1KpnEB/j9r6fs72nvsdGRXb4YzINaFISIpVnZOrCVAb+73TZ2986kyvh+U0P 6mdzXfaWXZbmCJ8TSvsFOJAfue1rTHSyLK2eTYwmmjI6+K0pXZ7QNjJ9OWEBzEYUIc2vx2Y4W uvOUAQKCBPvN3KAxK71t8kfUk+Lj/VyHXS1NQUIKC5wOsXDZPrBAYj3VrDCVwIZvQazmAxQyo wpCH1Lg1CgKJ1bZwqRsSBHL7V7DrxPWjenIiZWAbcVwNNOuHBFSoIXuZ7drHzHOVZ6RqDAE87 LKzpMlD7K1B2OVs1wLd6ssik+ytTi8o7cx5mnMfSJdH4XJk2x+jG9pIFlGdGqaRMQz/YN22PZ CRPJ1ZGrR5WNrkvIf9sEveuK9BqqdGCHXuS3H1SQc8BmtDb7gX/ptrlII6gfkFoIoeTxy7qjE +rSlW4H5Ov+4MsT5CeIOC9v6gTJUS7tnPz3Nkp6ZWQ1aY7qKPopuhop9THuYnbfpd9/OW7Lpu RIW4R9IV/zYKxgzXgP7xlP53lX/dWs2JpLJA+3BjhR9Zam/ANJURq+jP4dOzc5id9i91kSNNf IjiGbuM1nLDKcvmN/N7/WuE88hsbyfNsKrzBI4dYQvUq1Z1yl+AJiMjbyqnwu1HYD+hglR9Uw 8YQIdzBUI/GcL3lQ3MRjvvuPxEAGA35TiO/EsZ2iuZ16vTgPZZfPZv/R2A4sdtUFg6zqBCuN2 81quKgsD8p2yv5GHjy7NsKldubFIuIUoa+FBtCTjoQRksAvhTm8O8I8A3wOLXzhfHztIlLZX X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:138449 Archived-At: > The plot attached the last time shows all > of the raw data, and you should clearly see the different slopes of the > two trials: i.e. one is leaking and the other is not. [...] > Again, the plot is much more descriptive. I sadly have to admit that I misinterpreted your last posts completely simply because I then missed the pdf attachment (which I usually don't see with my settings). When you were talking about blue and green lines I thought of them as borders we'd better not transgress ... So most of my earlier remarks were just silly. Now everything is much much clearer to me. In fact, your plots make it easy to distinguish the "upfront" consumption from the actual leaks and allow to see the leakage clearly. I'll eventually have to include links to your plots in the code. > Does any of this speak to you? The only thing that still stupefies me is why an 80k cons threshold eventually produces strictly more leakage than the 800k and 8000k ones. Do you have an explanation for that? Doesn't that also mean that with such a low threshold running the test for some twenty minutes will have us run out of memory? Ah yes. Could you please run GTK (not the crashing one) with the 80k and 8000k cons thresholds too? Many thanks, martin