From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28605: 26.0.60; Part of leftmost character hidden Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 10:00:12 +0200 Message-ID: <59DB2C8C.7040706@gmx.at> References: <59CE05F2.1010202@gmx.at> <59CE8E74.5010308@gmx.at> <59D35549.6030905@gmx.at> <87wp4c750c.fsf@gmail.com> <59D4A45F.5010606@gmx.at> <87tvzfjfcp.fsf@gmail.com> <59D5E8F6.8080002@gmx.at> <87efqikk0x.fsf@gmail.com> <87a815lq3w.fsf@gmail.com> <59D73C6F.3020907@gmx.at> <87o9pk65ae.fsf@gmail.com> <59D74E49.2000605@gmx.at> <87a8145wcr.fsf@gmail.com> <59D88B8B.6050205@gmx.at> <87d15z6uo1.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507536142 8914 195.159.176.226 (9 Oct 2017 08:02:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 08:02:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Robert Pluim , Ola Nilsson , 28605@debbugs.gnu.org, Kaushal To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 09 10:02:16 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e1T0x-0001jl-Rl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 10:02:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56596 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1T15-0008Sd-Cu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 04:02:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39781) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1Szu-0007q1-KO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 04:01:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1Szn-0005Vv-6L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 04:01:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48397) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1Szn-0005Vo-2D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 04:01:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e1Szm-0007MZ-QY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 04:01:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 08:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28605 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28605-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28605.150753602728228 (code B ref 28605); Mon, 09 Oct 2017 08:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28605) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Oct 2017 08:00:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57074 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e1SzD-0007LD-Mx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 04:00:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:64507) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e1SzC-0007L1-Fi for 28605@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 04:00:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([46.125.250.35]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LfXmv-1dUJ220efh-00p7FT; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 10:00:19 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87d15z6uo1.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:xK51cEoYWUI8kXuw8KhpfuYBkrgaw335177u50eoSd6zJQ6ic5j MkPOlZRlK3nP66FXFzPn0G655F7Rl0H1TKex6QjQwsDX/szRci+N4Np/ma/5JHgKyViCIhW SgQeL/umcSgI/Hlqui3XuqN43WVy2kqyMLzelEzTwXJHntXJkNICnU+fg0873ctJWWnV1Yh Jr9OYELM2F06xAx1tYBAA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:gZr63lF+ZAQ=:v13a04e1Hoyho0QsQslSM9 SsEPeOYBhcuQL4Xm3HPrWHdb2MNpXBQDOyQbQcg1lsuq4sbQNk6DTEINR4/t82FUF+zV2DSqZ 8Qc5usD6N8bhIjomB6MaJ4RvO982azyYE+eX+5LEh4g2Pmgc6bjeQTn+6CgQbVe3PQLBIJrQZ XDlaBKa114sQk0SVkOSptMMaodiQAkvtKZdOUeajflsIWFGunX+nz3pVhwWMSF0MMhfQKttlR czVfY4csX+aYsiPtpD81W1Smk8tV4BG1SAOamGYTKoWeJwkOqJe4u1Wq2MBG4d5AA95QhjTqH d1dZeaeyf5CXPQn+7YJ26gnac9ihLKhcAInQP5jA68gUyYDHaxMV1uVdadKl/V+Qvvfyf2Ay+ mnP6Usp4OMYIknZ0XICvHO0vPq//UtTko9IxGV13c8itgaestRoLNcV3CodMyPyxTx8e58Pa7 y58MKd8mbVkUu9GdEv+CNeAPb2k/eMaQKEDmpIq0bQLVpQfPo9n3+GQryD7JDnRPl+lDTJqaB yuVUCOplv7fAaoLhHBZ0dF7DkT4Vvnho9KKyXNWQWGkQM0OFIARWFxjYbD9Ac89WKA0A8tmDn z4TeipxkFqc1Dbv8fKJujnqFJCP489wXOu937yHnacvZ7ojPAhZrrgCses2PLas02Z06TYw+c dzyWNQQb0AdwFNJxqx9TwuUMo6y0MbSi5jHPtFGX6sqY/EEHCY49JIU0OSG7rURsUcqJLhTId WYZ3PyopJnp2KOWIqSyHyErTTTnP2m8JYDzq8FqXAc8yfxBfRBPq7XlH5Y2RGJQSbsMmFNaG X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:138101 Archived-At: > If I remember correctly, in some places it looked at the GDK_SCALE > environment variable (which is normally not set on most systems) and in > other places it queried GTK for what the scaling is, leading to general > confusion of what the frame size was supposed to be. OK. Are we sure that we now detect any scaling if present? Or should we allow the user (who might know better) to explicitly supply a scaling factor which overrides a return value of 0 (?) or 1 from the above. martin