From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28189: 26.0.50; Emacs uses deprecated function gtk_window_parse_geometry Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 15:21:53 +0200 Message-ID: <59C65FF1.4010602@gmx.at> References: <599D40CB.1090100@gmx.at> <599D80D1.6090508@gmx.at> <59A13F90.5080804@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1506172994 31229 195.159.176.226 (23 Sep 2017 13:23:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 13:23:14 +0000 (UTC) To: Philipp Stephani , 28189@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 23 15:23:10 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dvkOj-0007qM-Mu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 15:23:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34991 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dvkOr-0001qc-2m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 09:23:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47607) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dvkOg-0001qJ-Iv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 09:23:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dvkOc-00079Y-Jt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 09:23:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44954) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dvkOc-00079M-FC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 09:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dvkOc-00007K-88 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 09:23:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 13:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28189 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28189-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28189.1506172926343 (code B ref 28189); Sat, 23 Sep 2017 13:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28189) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Sep 2017 13:22:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53634 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dvkNh-00005O-Rj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 09:22:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:58947) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dvkNg-0008WL-8q for 28189@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 09:22:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([46.125.250.28]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MQih7-1doH2O2RfZ-00TyWQ; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 15:21:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:EqMxKo6BX9qvF06AU9LDO+f/UspcLmhP4zPs5n2VrfEV/PeNER9 bD/ayVlluRZO22H00nzE2NHeqoOUxGHUVgXO8DBzioQM2KOmS7Oay214H5DlUFWh+ySI/fG W4+G2bH21kIxfeKHwCa7q4uLqvpl5eTNXzRLYtCG3SPw2W+dyn20fCPDdqbxZ+8Gnr/zD71 42LDillwGQJfSUG5PRlNQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:kMOIGtedeuM=:N+AiUeRm562+nV3rYTbGET Ho1F52PmVO8ziCutjUYNNQWCdeCAL8KwNzJgqURm5rtiewhlSR4RsLSJf8boPz0ZT5rhJ10LR o0EhDp6hia1MLOxMoo1qhN/RneypfDzKyJGpx7evK4pPtJWbEeW3l7lPpbXLPqpwug2LkD82T YXE8i7TB3r9TSInHQ9DY0cYWseD5rHkbltVTgJikJy7paLHtVW18U7sOyRuCjZiZjawX6KGF+ QKek5SEa8bf3EytEPSyclv330LbBAxSu/58Eb9R7F992A2ddQaWAc7w7YpYxfuqbszwXA9GjE GKKEw76SM/THGNz5uDngmb/q8maYTJBfOR1iN2iMfAJVwsjQXyLwuemCffIK9nwzLLvoij+J3 0uP1YLJtvqaQHLtTGbC1vNPWvzqESqbQtPtr7pUV+v/VwFthbDVEX1ePo3s5y8Daaxa0fL/m4 JcYatn0heGWdxcGlpb7sFC7qWOd8UqoFNHBjT++w/rrJh5w9YHTXkQYNGHzUWXzYRjY7AZGUn 3dAfjIfm3l2voIUceIZ/n4sN3oLlL0Y4wON2jaZEjottc458gpWfm3GQ+COYUcUXYolRN7NIk kpO3vOikDjilfsOAyYwgyz7cSZGUmRpZ5ZKvyzvqkyI0SZTEH86ywwKaNzPz5yj9aA3u2jJD8 lY02GoYs9I2yYJoE9eU5B8wbI4gl0LeXIUbR4+I3OmLuRQNwxZK7GjyyVZhKqUYsx0KlXn1Il y7IcSVG4S+sYpB9i2t9/AhK5vPQ1sDa7TwOeD2ltRG57A4Wic4d0vC2GjwjjQZw7461HLzhU X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:137284 Archived-At: > I've now pushed the remaining changes as well, Thanks. At least for the background color fix your decision to push to master was probably right. But we really should consider backporting your changes to the release branch if after a few weeks no problems arise. From recent bug reports it's quite evident that most people remained on master and the release branch is hardly tested at all. So I'm quite confident that your changes are already getting tested. > except for the popup menu > change. With that change, the menus seem to get positioned incorrectly > along the vertical axis, but I can't figure out how to fix it. I could push > the changes nevertheless and hope that somebody else might find a fix. WDYT? Please post this patch separately and explicitly ask people to try it. The GTK menu bug reports (25064, 26130, 26855, 27131, 27667, 28511) - though most of them by the same author but yet all with GTK 3.22 - abandon and really should get treatment before the release. Virtually any patch might give us some insight here. So please send the patch to the thread with most of the reports (25064, 26130, 26855, 27131) merged in and let's see whether it at least eliminates some warnings. Maybe we're lucky. And again many thanks for your efforts, martin